Another possible miracle attributed to Newman... and other highlights from the CIEL-UK conference

I attended the CIEL (Centre International d'Etudes Liturgiques) Mass and one-day conference yesterday (29 May). This event was held at the Brompton Oratory.

It was a truly inspirational day. The Pontifical High Mass (1962) for the Saturday in Pentecost (an Ember Day) was really wonderful. In fact, it was probably one of the most prayerful liturgies that I've ever attended, but that might be something to do with the fact that I'm now beginning to know my way around the classical Roman rite!

After Mass I went off in search of some lunch. Having eaten my fill, and with an hour to spare, I went to the Victoria & Albert Museum, to have a look at their collection of altar-pieces. I managed to take some pictures, and hope to write about this permanent display sometime in the near future.

In the afternoon we were treated to two lectures.

The first was by the eminent Scottish musician and composer, Dr James MacMillan. He will be setting the new English translation of the Mass to music in time for the Pope's visit to the UK. In fact, it seems that this work has been completed, and is in the process of being rehearsed by various groups and choirs.

James MacMillan spoke passionately about the need to correct the liturgical abuses that have occurred during the past 40 years - when those who misinterpreted the Second Vatican Council seemed hell-bent on destroying proper Catholic liturgy. Recent attempts by modernists to write music for the Mass have resulted in the creation of works which have deviated from the liturgical text. In fact, it seems that a high number of post-Vatican II Glorias or Kyries were rewritten to suit the socio-political agenda of the "NuChurch". Dr MacMillan believes strongly that the "reform of the reform" or the "Benedictine reform" will be indispensable in righting the wrongs of the recent past.

James MacMillan also spoke about the importance of the unitary values of goodness, truth and beauty as guiding principles for Catholic liturgy. In fact, Pope Benedict XVI has also often referred to these Platonic principles, which are a central element, in relating to the Creator, of the Christian Gospel. The unitary aspect of these three values is especially seen in the Epistle of St James.

MacMillan referred in passing to the fact that some bishops seem very unwilling to keep up with the times, and participate in the Benedictine reforms of the liturgy. It seems that a Vatican official has been asking why it is that the Bishops' Conference in England and Wales still hasn't applied to publish the new text of the Mass. Their delay might cause some embarrassment when the Pope comes, for he will be using a Mass which hasn't yet been approved by the local hierarchy!

The second speaker was the Very Rev Richard Duffield Cong.Orat., who is the Provost of the Birmingham Oratory. He also celebrated the morning's Mass, along with Frs Andrew Southwell (St Bede's, Clapham Park) and Rupert McHardy (London Oratory) who acted as deacon and sub-deacon.

Fr Duffield is an excellent and witty speaker! He definitely possesses what might be described as the "Oratorian sense of humour", which can manifest itself in a dry and yet light-hearted way.

The thrust of Fr Duffield's lecture was the background to Cardinal Newman's Cause - for which he is now the Actor, for, as he pointed out, the Postulator is the man in Rome. It seems that the Oratorians do not like to make a fuss, especially about one of their own. This explains why they hadn't asked for Newman's Cause to be opened until after the war - and even then it was in response to outside pressure, mainly from the Vatican and Pope Pius XII.

We were given a detailed account of the canonisation process, and the great amount of work that goes into declaring someone a saint! In Cardinal Newman's case all his work had to be documented and checked by competent scholars. Because of the vast amount of books, letters, and papers that John Henry Newman wrote this part of his Cause took longer than expected. It seems that Pope Paul VI wanted to beatify Newman in the 1970s, but the relevant investigations had not been competed in time. This explains why it was Pope John Paul II who finally conferred the title "Venerable" upon Cardinal Newman.

Fr Duffield spent some time concentrating on the miracle which made it possible for Newman to be considered for beatification. There has been a lot of misunderstanding surrounding this case - as the miracle is not that which the media assumes it to be. Most know that Rev Mr Jack Sullivan, an American deacon, prayed to Newman whilst he was suffering from severe back problems. As a result of Newman's intercession, Jack Sullivan was given immediate relief. After a few months, though, the symptoms reappeared, and Mr Sullivan had to undergo surgery. Many commentators suggest that this relapse is proof that a miracle didn't occur. What they don't say, though, is that the actual miracle happened after the surgery - when Jack Sullivan was completely relieved of all pain after three days, which is inexplicable - for in cases like his the post-operative pain would have been long-lasting and severe.

It also appears that there might now be another miracle that can be attributed to Cardinal Newman. Fr Duffield said that he couldn't give too much information away about the ins and outs of this case. If the miracle is accepted as being authentic, then this would pave the way for Newman's canonisation! It seems, from what Fr Richard Duffield said, that the "miracle" relates to an unborn girl, who had been diagnosed with a severe illness whilst still in the womb. The girl's family belong to an Oratorian parish in Mexico, and the parishioners held a prayer crusade for them, specifically asking for Newman's intercession. It appears that when the child was born, on the anniversary of the Cardinal's death, she had been completely cured!

The day ended with Benediction in the Little Oratory, and then some socialising... During which time I spoke with a very charming priest, Fr Armand de Malleray FSSP. He gave me a copy of a booklet he'd written on the life of Karl Leisner, a priest martyred under the Nazi oppression. It seems that this young man, a prisoner at Dachau, was studying for the priesthood before his arrest by the Nazis. Prior to this event he had been ordained to the diaconate. Just before his death, though, the camp had a new inmate, Bishop Gabriel Piguet of Clermont-Ferrand, who, together with other prisoners in holy orders, ordained Karl - who subsequently celebrated his first and last Mass two weeks later, in December 1944.

You see, it's well-worth attending these events, for one never knows who one might meet, or what one might learn!

Before I end, I would like to express my gratitude to those who organised the event, to the Brompton Oratory for hosing it, and to the excellent speakers.

Deo gratias

[Picture note: Karl Leisner, the young German priest martyred by the Nazis]

Feast of St Augustine of Canterbury - Westminster Cathedral

Here are some photos I took today (the feast of St Augustine of Canterbury), when I popped into the Chapel of Ss Gregory and Augustine in Westminster Cathedral. Of course, I remembered all those who read this blog whilst kneeling in this sacred place, and also offered prayers for the soul of Cardinal Hume, who is buried in the Chapel.

Above the altar we see Pope St Gregory and St Augustine of Canterbury, both of whom were Benedictine monks. The story of St Augustine's mission to convert the English is quite well-known, so I won't go into it here. In the image above the altar, St Gregory is shown with a dove flying to his side - which relates to the story from his life that when a monk happened upon the Saint busily writing he noticed this symbol of the Holy Spirit hovering near by. St Augustine is depicted holding the Gospels - which he preached to the English.The saints to the left and right of the centre-piece are St Augustine's companions - who were also liturgically commemorated today. These fellow missionaries are: St Paulinus (Bishop of York), St Justus (Bishop of Rochester), St Mellitus (Bishop of London), and St Laurence (who succeeded Augustine at Canterbury). Above these saints we see images of St Augustine meeting with Ethelbert and Bertha (King and Queen of Kent), as well as some other events from his life. Other walls in the Chapel, not pictured in this post, contain several extra scenes from the lives of the two great men, including St Gregory finding "Angles" (or "angels" as he famously referred to them: non Angli, sed angeli) in the Roman slave market.

The Chapel of Ss Gregory and Augustine was one of the first to be decorated in Westminster Cathedral. The mosaics were designed by J R Clayton of Clayton & Bell, and were laid between 1902 - 1904. The Cathedral's architect, J F Bentley was able to see some of the images in place just before his death in 1902. The decorations were paid for by Lord Brampton - who had originally planned to be buried here. Unfortunately, this was not to be, but two great leaders of English Catholicism are laid to rest here: namely Bishop Richard Challoner (Vicar Apostolic until 1781), and the much loved George Basil Cardinal Hume, who was Archbishop of Westminster until his death in June 1999. Cardinal Hume was a Benedictine, and had been Abbot of Ampleforth before being called to Westminster - so it's rather fitting that this son of St Benedict now rests in a place that commemorates his brethren.

For more information on the various chapels in Westminster Cathedral, please see Westminster Cathedral: From Darkness to Light by Patrick Rogers (Continuum, 2003).

N.B. After the Second Vatican Council it has not been customary for new Cardinals to be presented with the red galero - therefore the one seen hanging from the ceiling was not given to Cardinal Hume. Rather, this galero was made by one of his relatives, who wished that he be buried in a manner befitting a prince of the Church. Of course, the old tradition is that once the hat turns completely to dust and drops to the ground, the soul of whichever cardinal it once belonged to is then ready to move on from Purgatory and enters Heaven!

Solemn Pontifical Mass for the Feast of St Philip Neri

To the left and below are some pictures from tonight's Mass for St Philip's Day at the Brompton Oratory. The celebrant was Archbishop Vincent Nichols - who seemed impressed by Catholicism turned up to the max, so to speak! It was so nice to see him celebrate the novus ordo in Latin, ad orientem. It was also good to be given a proper episcopal blessing at the end.

The homily was excellently preached, and researched. A most powerful meditation on the life of St Philip - the "joyful" saint. One was left feeling that here is a bishop who feels privileged to share in the Apostolic Succession, and who is grateful of our rich Catholic heritage. And tonight, I'm sure that all those who were at the Mass can easily join in with the psalmist in proclaiming: "welcome indeed the heritage that falls to me!"

Of course, the liturgy was superb and the music stunning - thanks to the Fathers and servers of the Oratory, as well as the Choir and the Orchestra. Our hearts and souls were lifted up on high thanks to Haydn's beautiful "Nelson Mass", and the prayerful solemnity of those leading us in worshp. As weak and fragile a person as I am, this solemn liturgy brought me closer to the love of God - and the gift of being part of this Mass in honour of St Philip truly brought to mind the words of scripture: "Praise is fitting for loyal hearts."

Here are some pictures from the evening. I didn't expect to take any photos, and didn't want to disturb the solemnity of the Mass, so please excuse the poor quality of the images (which were taken very discreetly on an old and useless camera). If I shouldn't have fallen into the temptation to sneak a few snaps, then a genuine mea cupla is offered.

The Sanctuary before Mass












The Shrine Chapel of St Philip Neri












The Offertory












The Sanctus











The Relic of St Philip Neri











The Archbishop venerating the relic before blessing the people with it












UPDATE 28/5/10 For proper pictures of the event, please see the New Liturgical Movement website (here).

[Picture note: at the top of the page is a photo of the prayer card commemorating today's celebration]

Queen looks forward to hosting the Pope

It was a joy to witness the State Opening of Parliament this morning. A truly wonderful spectacle - so it's a bit of a shame that not that many people come to see the event. Whenever I've gone along - usually late - it's been quite easy to find a good vantage point!

Amongst all the proposed bills announced in the Queen's Speech, a mention of the Pope's state visit was made: -

The Duke of Edinburgh and I look forward to... receiving His Holiness Pope Benedict the Sixteenth in September.

It's usually customary for the monarch to list some of her future engagements, especially those that involve state visits - but, the manner in which the Queen delivered this part of the text, seemed most warm and genuine. We Catholics have nothing to fear concerning the Papal visit, and should give it our full support. It will indirectly honour the Catholic community here in the UK, and will also be a great opportunity for those searching for the truth to hear it loud and clear from the Successor of St Peter.

From the photos you'll notice that I was standing in Parliament Square, amongst the various protest groups. Some have turned this area into a strange Communist-type enclave. It really is unsightly, and the local council is trying to evict the trespassers.A fair number of the residents of this teepee village seem to be genuinely in need of specialist care.

At one point a police officer turned to her Sergeant and said, "there he is Sarge", whilst pointing to a bizarrely dressed character. I took a photo of him, and realised that he was none other than the laicised priest, Neil Horan. He is often seen at big state or sporting events - and has been known to run in front of cars or athletes whilst carrying his apocalyptic placards. This poor fellow was ordained in 1973, and was formally laicised, after having been suspended for years, in 2005. It was left to Rt Rev Kevin McDonald, who was then Archbishop of Southwark, to give Neil Horan the "bad" (for him) news. Of course, the "Dancing Priest", as Horan is sometimes referred to, refused to acknowledge Rome's decision, and continues to call himself a priest. Unfortunately, he is not the only suspended or laicised priest in London who refuses to accept the removal of his faculties.

The Church needs to have a process of psychological assessment for those who wish to discern a vocation to the sacred priesthood. Here in the UK, this seems to be part of the course. Sometimes, though, bishops can be overly-dependent on liberal psychology, as opposed to faith-based assessments, or just plain common sense!

[Picture note: The Queen and Prince Philip leaving Parliament; The protest "village" on Parliament Square (note the rainbow flag - is that being used as a symbol of "peace" or "homosexuality"?); Neil Horan, the well-known demonstrator. All taken on 25/5/10]

More distorted reporting from the Times

It seems that the Rome correspondent for the Times, Richard Owen, is continuing in his obsession with portraying the Catholic Church in a bad light. Facts and truth seem secondary to a dig at popery! At the rate the Times is going, it will succeed in making even the BBC seem objective - now, that would be a feat!

The latest anti-Catholic nonsense to issue forth from hacks' corner was a report by Richard Owen on the recent reburial and honouring of Nicolaus Copernicus during a splendid requiem Mass in Poland (22 May). Those with a smidgen of knowledge about the life of Copernicus agree that he died as he had lived, a highly respected cleric (we're not sure whether he rose above minor orders, but he probably did) of the Catholic Church. His famous work, De revolutionibus orbium coelestium, in which his ideas concerning a heliocentric Universe were recorded, was dedicated to Pope Paul III. It was a Cardinal friend of his (Nicholas Schonberg) who had encouraged Copernicus to write down his theories, for the sake of good science. Not according to Owen, though - who makes the unfounded claim that the Church had branded Copernicus a "heretic". Copernican books might have been banned for a while, but never was his work declared heretical (see here). Further on in his piece Richard Owen seems to suggest the scientist was "buried in an unmarked grave beneath the floor of the cathedral at Frombork" because of the supposed "heresy" - although he later admits that "Copernicus was not persecuted in his lifetime." The solemn reburial of Copernicus is described in the Times as a means for the Church to "rehabilitate" the cleric - whereas, in fact, no rehabilitation was needed, for he has been honoured in his old Cathedral for centuries (see picture)!

The truth of the matter is that most, if not all, people were buried in unmarked graves during the 16th century. In fact, with the exception of wealthy aristocrats or bishops, the vast majority of people were laid to rest in anonymity until relatively recently. Although Copernicus had been a respected scholar and cleric, this wouldn't necessarily have granted him the honour of an inscribed tomb. He was never condemned for heresy, or even tried for it - if he had, then he would not have been granted the privilege of being buried within a Cathedral church! Having said that, even some great saints of the Church, such as Aquinas, have often been suspected of heresy - before a proper investigation of the facts. All geniuses, theological or scientific, can have a hard time of it, especially when being inevitably misunderstood by simpler minds, or less pure hearts.

Some Catholic objections to De revolutionibus did surface in later years, but, as the New Advent Catholic Encyclopaedia points out (here), these concerns flowed either from reactions to the Galileo controversy (see earlier post) or to the Scriptural literalism of Protestant theologians. The Church's main concerns about the book, though, related to questions regarding the scientific flaws of the heliocentric theory (i.e. it seemed to report as fact, something yet unknown) - and the Church was right to be concerned, for the sun does not inhabit the centre of the Universe! Richard Owen says that De revolutionibus remained on the Index of proscribed books until 1835 - though it seems that the journalist is confusing dates here. He should have read the succinct entry on Copernicus in New Advent, which states:

On 5 March, 1616, the work of Copernicus was forbidden by the Congregation of the Index "until corrected", and in 1620 these corrections were indicated. Nine sentences, by which the heliocentric system was represented as certain, had to be either omitted or changed. This done, the reading of the book was allowed. In 1758 the book of Copernicus disappeared from the revised Index of Benedict XIV. New editions were issued in Basle (1566) by Rheticus; in Amsterdam (1617) by Müller of Göttingen, in Warsaw (1854) an edition de luxe with Polish translation and the real preface of Copernicus; and the latest (5th) in Torun (1873) by the Copernicus Society, on the four hundredth anniversary of the author's birthday, with all the corrections of the text, made by Copernicus, given as foot-notes. [Emphasis mine]

The facts of the story are that the Cathedral authorities at Frombork have been trying to discover the last resting place of one of their most famous sons - in order to have his remains honoured - since 1802! Eventually, after over 200 years, the bones of Copernicus were discovered in 2005, and identified using DNA testing (some hair had been preserved during his lifetime). There had been, and still is, a memorial plaque dedicated to Nicolaus Copernicus at Frombork Cathedral, dating from 1580 (but rebuilt in 1735). Not exactly, the actions of a Church which viewed the scientist with grave suspicion (excuse the pun)!

During his lifetime, Copernicus had many enemies - but they all tended to be Protestants, such as Calvin and Luther. Of course, Richard Owen quotes some Dutchman who claims the opposite, but seeing that this man's area of "expertise" is the "censorship of science in Rome" it might be wise to question his objectivity. There were some from within the Catholic Church, usually his superiors, who remonstrated with Copernicus - but they tended to be the ones pleading with him to put his mistresses away (which he did, eventually)!

To be fair to the Times, though, it seems that they were not the only ones to misrepresent this story. One Austen Ivereigh, reporting in the liberal Jesuit weekly America seems to rejoice that Copernicus has now been "vindicated" after what is suggested to have been a long injustice at the hands of the Catholic Church! But that, my friends, is another story!

[Picture note: The epitaph to Nicolaus Copernicus in Frombork Cathedral - dated 1735, though replacing an earlier one that had been destroyed in battle. Please note the words "Monumentum hoc in fraterni amoris, aestimationisque tesseram praelati, canonici, totumque Varmiense capitulum posuere", which roughly translates as "This monument was erected as a sign of brotherly love and appreciation by the prelates, canons, and the entire Chapter of Varmiense(?)." Source: Wikimedia Commons, here]

Please remember the Church in China

Today, 24 May, is when the Church venerates the Blessed Virgin Mary, under the title "Help of Christians". It is also the Day of Prayer for the Church in China.

This special day, when all Christians throughout the world are specifically asked to remember the Church in China, was established by Pope Benedict XVI in 2007, with the publication of his Letter to Chinese Catholics. The first Day of Prayer for the Church in China was observed on 24 May 2008.

The Holy Father noted in his letter to the Catholics of China that 24 May is the day the Church commemorates Our Lady, Help of Christians - therefore urging believers to ask her intercession for the persecuted followers of Christ who live in the Communist State. In China the Virgin Mary is venerated under this title at the Shrine of She-Shan, in Shanghai. For this reason, then, the Pope placed this day under her patronage.

Here is a small segment from the Holy Father's letter to the Chinese, explaining his intentions and desire for a universal day of prayer on 24 May:

"This day is dedicated to the liturgical memorial of Our Lady, Help of Christians, who is venerated with great devotion at the Marian Shrine of Sheshan in Shanghai. I would like that date to be kept by you as a day of prayer for the Church in China. I encourage you to celebrate it by renewing your communion of faith in Jesus our Lord and of faithfulness to the Pope, and by praying that the unity among you may become ever deeper and more visible . . . On that same day, the Catholics of the whole world – in particular those who are of Chinese origin – will demonstrate their fraternal solidarity and solicitude for you, asking the Lord of history for the gift of perseverance in witness, in the certainty that your sufferings past and present for the Holy Name of Jesus and your intrepid loyalty to his Vicar on earth will be rewarded, even if at times everything can seem a failure"

Yesterday, after the recitation of the Regina Caeli, the Holy Father repeated his plea that Catholics from all over the world, but especially those of Chinese origin, should remember with fervour the persecuted Church in China today.

Pope Benedict XVI also noted yesterday, Pentecost Sunday, that:

"There is no Pentecost without the Virgin Mary. Thus it was at the beginning, in the Upper Room where the disciples 'devoted themselves to prayer, together with some women and Mary, the Mother of Jesus, and his brothers.'"

He referred to his recent visit to Fatima, describing this holy place as "another Pentecost". He reminded his flock that the Church lives in a state of continuous Pentecost, a constant outpouring of the Holy Spirit, "without which it would exhaust its strength, like a sailboat without wind."



[Both the image of Our Lady She-Shan, and Cardinal Kung's prayer for the Chinese Church can be found on The Cardinal Kung Foundation's website]

"Strive to preserve the unity of the spirit in the bond of peace....

One body and one Spirit, as you were also called to the one hope of your calling." (Eph 4: 3-4)

Catholic and Orthodox unity?

It was with great joy that I read Fr Frederico Lombardi's weekly editorial on the Vatican Radio website yesterday. Fr Lombardi is the Jesuit in charge of the Holy See's press office. In effect, therefore, he is often seen as the Pope's spokesman.

Fr Frederico specifically concentrated on the Days of Russian Spirituality and Culture event that was held in the Vatican last week. These days were a celebration of all things Russian, and culminated a couple of nights ago with a special gift presented to the Pope by Patriarch Kirill of Moscow - a lavish concert of Russian music, performed by some of the best musicians from that land (see the Rome Reports video below). It was an event which Fr Lombardi described as "an important step in relations between the Catholic Church and Russian Orthodox Church." In fact, the musical celebration was something that helped bring about a furthering of real harmony between both the Catholic and Orthodox Churches, the two "lungs of Christendom" as Pope John Paul II called them. It seems that the pre and post concert speeches by the Pope and the Patriarch's representative, Metropolitan Hilarion Alfeyev of Volokolamsk (who wrote one of the musical compositions in honour of the Holy Father), were unexpectedly warm. Fr Lombardi said that the words of the Metropolitan went "far beyond normal courtesy." He ended his editorial reflection with these extremely positive words:

"The resounding notes of the great Russian music in the Vatican was an eloquent sign of the deep harmony that has been established between the Russian Orthodox Church and Catholic Church on these crucial perspectives [our common heritage, faith and concerns about preserving European civilisation]. A very encouraging sign for the future."

It seems that the Holy Spirit is bringing about a great work - will the third millennium finally see the fullness of unity between Eastern and Western Christendom? Some are even suggesting that a high level summit of the two Christian branches is to be expected when the Holy Father visits Cyprus next month. Richard Owen, writing in the Times three days ago, suggested that both the Pope and Patriarch Kirill might finally meet on the Mediterranean island, which once hosted St Paul. Since this article appeared many more commentators have been of the same opinion, whilst others have even speculated that Patriarch Bartholomew of Constantinople might also turn up. It's certainly worth noting that Patriarch Bartholomew went to visit Patriarch Kirill, on a special pilgrimage to Russia, within hours of the historic Vatican event! Are the two main fathers of Orthodoxy about to make an offer to the Patriarch of the West, is the Holy Spirit about to confound the 'sower of disunity' yet again?



If there's one thing we know about the ways of the Spirit, it's that He "blows wherever He wills". With an open heart and mind, great things can be achieved when the Paraclete swoops down from Heaven to bestow His gifts!

Veni Sancte Spiritus!

UPDATE 25/5/10 Please see this (here) excellent article on this subject by Sandro Magister, on Catholic Online.

[Picture note: The Russian Orthodox Cathedral of the Dormition of the Most Holy Mother of God and Holy Royal Martyrs, Ennismore Gardens, London. I happened to visit this church yesterday, just after the 12:15pm Latin Mass at the Brompton Oratory]

It's time to blow away the smoke of Satan from our sanctuaries

I have never really been a great fan of "rap" or "hip-hop" as forms of musical expression. In fact, I am only just coming to terms with polyphony! Last night, though, I happened upon these two videos, and was, for the first time, quite moved by modern, as in really modern, music!

Have a listen and a look at these excellent videos - which proclaim a great truth, and filled me, for one, with hope and renewed energy.

For more information about the songs and the artists, please click on the videos to be taken to the YouTube site, or visit Phatmass.com





It's well-known that Pope Paul VI, when realising that the ancient liturgy of the Catholic Church was being destroyed by those misinterpreting the Second Vatican Council, publicly declared that "through some unknown fissure, the smoke of Satan has entered the Sanctuary of the Church." This "smoke" has resulted in all types of liturgical abuse, and false teachings. We poor of God have had to witness heinous acts of vandalism and sacrilege committed by supposed priests, those to whom we were entrusted. Bishops have led souls to their doom, and so-called religious leaders have lied, and dragged men and women from true worship. Reverence has been lost, obedience is laughed at, and we have forgotten how to kneel before the Almighty God of Heaven! Many Christians now think it more loving to support a sinner on his way to destruction, than to repent with tears before the Eternal Creator, or call those who are destroying life to penance!

Thankfully, Our Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ promised his flock that "the Gates of Hell would not prevail." The Church, therefore, will always triumph - and the smoke of Satan will give way to the sweetest-smelling incense of Jesus Christ! We are following our Lord and Master. He who Rose from the dead will raise us up with Him. Where He has gone, we hope to follow. We will never fail if He is with us. Our enemies, the liars and wolves, both inside and outside the Church, will be crushed - destruction is theirs. He has promised victory to those who love Him.

Our Lord has given us Pope Benedict XVI - and he knows who the enemies are, especially those blind-guides who have infested the Church. He will, by God's grace, hold firm and bring true reform to the Church. Thank goodness for a Pontiff who is most gloriously, and unashamedly, Catholic. He will lead those who listen to Christ. He will lead those who trust in the mercy, love, and truth of Almighty God - who trust in the teachings that the Church has preserved for the past 2,000 years. He will lead us to a better place, where we can reverently follow our Master.

Those who have been beguiled by Satan's smoke - dancing liturgically all the way - must answer for the filth that has been inflicted upon the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass, and upon the most beautiful and powerful presence of Jesus Christ in the Blessed Sacrament!

Let's use this Pentecost to call down the Holy Spirit, that He may drive out the smoke of Satan from the sanctuaries. Let's ask the Father of the Poor to wash the Church clean, so that we, followers of Jesus Christ, may proclaim with joy, liberty and unashamed love that Jesus Christ is Risen, and that the Gates of the evil one will never, ever prevail against the Church!

O come Holy Spirit, searching Fire, and ignite in our hearts the flames of your Love. Amen

HE Faustino Sainz Muñoz suffers a stroke

Please keep HE Archbishop Faustino Sainz Muñoz in your prayers. The Papal Nuncio to the Court of St James was taken ill the other day - suffering a stroke - and has been taken to hospital to recover. For more on the story, please see Catholic Independent News. Those who have come across the Nuncio, or met him in private or at functions, know that he is a warm, humble and joyful man.

The Archbishop has been the Nuncio in Britain for six years, having been appointed by Pope John Paul II. This news, though, might mean that he will soon be replaced for health reasons - he is currently 72-years-old. Would we then get a more traditionalist Nuncio - to counter what some see as a fairly liberal hierarchy? Pope Benedict XVI is known for his wise appointments, especially where the faith seems to have lost its way.

It seems more than likely that Cardinal George Pell, of Sydney, is about to be appointed the next Prefect of the Congregation for Bishops (see Andrea Torinelli's blog, here, and Damian Thompson's, here). If this does happen, then we can expect a huge shake-up amongst the English and Welsh bishops, especially so when Cardinal Cormac Murphy-O'Connor retires from his honorary position within the Congregation. It appears that Cardinal Pell knows how un-RC the Catholic bishops of this country have been during the past 20 - 30 years or so. Like so many other Conferences in Europe and North America, it could be argued that our bishops seem to have favoured the misguided interpretation of Vatican II (i.e. the one that led to the creation of a New Church of socialists and gay-rights campaigners). All the excesses of the recent past would soon be put to rights with a man such as Cardinal Pell leading the body that appoints bishops. If we were given a traditionalist Nuncio, too, then we could even see lists of potential bishops being sent to Rome that comprise orthodox and conservative men!

At the moment, though, it is good and just to hold HE Sainz Muñoz in prayer, that he may have all the rest and recuperation he needs.

Prayer always brings in an abundant harvest...

Book review: The Rage Against God by Peter Hitchens

Since the announcement was made that Pope Benedict XVI was to visit the UK this September Catholics have been subjected to quite a lot of the rage against God that this book seeks to explore, explain and counter. Those who read the Daily Mail will be familiar with Peter Hitchens, and his world-view – which is diametrically opposed to that of his well-known atheist brother, Christopher. In fact, those of us who are familiar with the teachings of Joseph Ratzinger, who warns of the “dictatorship of relativism”, cannot but notice similarities between the thoughts of Peter Hitchens and the Pope. Both men are gravely concerned that Western secularism, coupled with the “frustrated rage” of atheism, is leading humanity into a new, and very dangerous, form of anti-theistic intolerance and an unrelenting persecution of faith. This anxiety regarding the future of Europe, and especially Britain, is coupled, for Hitchens, with a touching concern for his brother, and his unremitting atheism.

The Rage Against God is part auto-biography, part essay against the encroaching tide of self-righteous, and often state-sponsored, anti-theism. The biographical sketches contain vivid, and sometimes poetic, examples of Hitchens’ “perfect and complete rebellion against everything [he] had been brought up to believe.” In the first chapters the author describes his own atheistic youth, and the years he spent dreaming of a Trotskyist utopia. He explains his earlier atheism by setting it in the context of his adolescence. It was a time when “the rather Victorian faith in something called ‘science’” was very common. It was also an age scarred by a general loss of confidence in the old moral authorities - the Profumo Affair, amongst others, helping to open the door to “an astonishing swiftness of change” in sexual morality. The Anglican Church was perceived as having colluded in the blind call to submit to those in authority. It had also been “powerfully damaged” by allowing “itself be confused with love of country and the making of great wars.” All these things, coupled with the particularly adolescent loathing of “anything which suggested the existence and presence of death”, led Hitchens to “set fire to [his] Bible on the playing fields of [his] Cambridge boarding school one bright, windy spring afternoon in 1967.” A few years later, this new found atheism led to a desire to create a godless utopia – and therefore to Trotskyism. Looking back on these events Hitchens now says, “Unlike Christians, atheists have a very high opinion of their own virtue”!

Since the Second World War the Church in the UK has been “gradually driven into the margins of society.” The centralisation of state power post-1945, and the creating of the NHS, amongst other things, led to a socialist form of “secular egalitarianism” which the Anglican Church welcomed, at the time, as “Christian socialism”. Britain didn’t become totally secular straightaway – for the threats of the Cold War meant that the conservative character of “customs and traditions” was still needed. In effect, though, the “equality and diversity” and “multicultural” agendas of those in power, the ones who had rejected the version of Christianity that Hitchens himself had despised as a young man, saw Christianity as anti-freedom (usually within the realms of feminism, and sexual morality), and, therefore, as something to be rejected. The Church was viewed as an irrelevant relic, at best, or, otherwise, as a patriarchal regime that refused to die. The education system ensured that the Christian religion was taught as being just one of many, and not the traditional faith and heritage of Britain. Christian worship on the BBC was slowly moved to the graveyard slot. Those religious programmes that are now shown tend to “take the form of neutral or hostile discussion…featuring long items about Roman Catholic priests abusing children, or Anglican arguments about homosexuality.” There is a direct attempt to airbrush Christianity from our history, and from any rational or national debate. There is a biased need to make Christians look bad, and worthy of contempt. Atheism and anti-theism, on the other hand, have become vocal, and mainstream – with such champions as Richard Dawkins and the author’s own brother, Christopher. There has been a subtle, if not radical and revolutionary change in society, and the Church has been too slow or afraid to stand by the truth, and proclaim it without excuses.

Hitchens describes his time in Soviet Russia – and how this helped him realise the dangers of atheistic utopias. He spends a large portion of the book describing the persecution of the Church by the Soviets, and how relevant this Marxist rage against God is when it comes to understanding the new atheists of the 21st century. They act in very similar ways - persecutions against those that believe in God start off subtly, but eventually become more and more outrageous. Peter Hitchens has a real understanding of the atheist mindset. It was his coming to terms with the horror of atheism as expressed in political power, as well as an understanding of his own sinfulness and need for an absolute authority outside humanity, as a guarantor of morality, which led to his conversion to Christianity in the 1980s. The passage that describes the main event in this reawakening of faith – whilst gazing at Roger van der Weyden’s 15th century “Last Judgement” – is a powerful witness to the wisdom that comes from “fear of the Lord”.

Hitchens offers persuasive arguments against atheism in the book’s shorter second half. These reflections might not, as he himself admits, be the greatest of philosophical proofs. One assumes they’re not meant to be – the author is content to demonstrate how rational, necessary and good belief in God can be, and is. Sometimes, his obsession with his own witnessing of Soviet brutality does take over – and some of his ideas seem to be reactions to a dead, or dying, political movement. Having said that, it is obvious that Peter Hitchens is extremely concerned that we, as a society, are blindly walking into a form of totalitarianism which is very similar to that once found in the old USSR. We seem to be giving up freedom in the pursuit of hedonistic liberty, we are becoming the creators of an immoral morality, and millions of Westerners are now becoming more credulous and dogmatic (as atheists) as traditional faith is sneered at, and scorned. The state is already compromising Christian conscience, it is only a matter of time, therefore, before the followers of Jesus Christ are outlawed once more.

The Rage Against God is a must for those who wish to understand what motivates the external enemies of the Church, and who want to go into battle equipped with answers to the often twisted logic of the anti-theist. It is also a book that offers the real hope of faith, which always outlasts its enemies. Also, woven though it’s pages, is a mature and compassionate reflection on brotherly love – for it seems that both the Hitchens brothers, once referred to as “Cain and Abel”, have now reached a cease-fire in their sibling rivalry.

The Rage Against God, Peter Hitchens, Continuum 2010, £16.99

Our Lady of the Taper to visit the Pope in Westminster

The National Shrine of Wales is that of Our Lady of Cardigan, also known as Our Lady of the Taper. The history of this particular devotion to the Mother of God goes back many centuries - and the church of St Mary's (now Anglican), which was built to accommodate the first shrine chapel (which still stands to this day), dates to 1158. It appears that Rt Rev Tom Burns, the Bishop of Menevia, whilst on the ad limina visit, asked Pope Benedict XVI if he would like to bless the statue of Our Lady of Cardigan, as a sign of being "in touch" with the people of Wales - for the Holy Father will be unable to visit the Principality during his UK tour. The Pope seemed to think this was a very good idea - and apparently kept repeating the words "in touch with Wales", as if meditating on his role as Universal Pastor. Therefore, Our Lady of the Taper will travel to Westminster Cathedral in September, where Benedict XVI will bless a candle and place it in her hand. One can assume that the light from this taper will represent the Holy Father's prayers for the people of Wales. For more on this story, please see the Independent Catholic News website.

The history of the beginnings of the devotion to Our Lady in Cardigan is uncertain. The ancient story surrounding the discovery of the original statue suggests that the Virgin was found floating in the river Teifi, with lighted Taper in hand. It might be, though, that the devotion goes back to the town of Arras, in Flanders. Many merchants from this place had settled in Cardigan, and might have brought the statue with them. It is known that Arras had once been the site of a pilgrimage to the Blessed Virgin - who held a taper to symbolise both her Son (the Light of the World), and her constant intercession on behalf of Christians.

The original Shrine of Our Lady of Cardigan was destroyed during the Reformation. In fact, the statue was carted off to Chelsea, where it was publicly destroyed by fire - like so many others. In 1904, though, some Breton monks who had founded a monastery near Cardigan decided to revive the devotion to the Taper, and established a short-lived Shrine to the Virgin Mother. They even dedicated their Abbey to Our Lady of Cardigan, but, unfortunately, their presence in that part of Wales came to an end in 1916.

By 1952 Bishop Petit of Menevia had been told of the ancient devotion to Our Lady which had existed in his diocese centuries before. Together with Martin Gillett, who later founded the Ecumenical Society of the Blessed Virgin Mary, the Bishop decided to revive the Shrine, and restore the local devotion. In 1956 a new statue had been carved - which had been modelled on the original. Our Lady of Cardigan was blessed with great ceremony in Westminster Cathedral by Cardinal Griffin, before being sent to Menevia Cathedral, and then to Cardigan. It was another 14 years before a proper shrine to Our Lady of the Taper was built - which was blessed by the two Welsh bishops, Petit and Fox. On 25 July 1970 the statue was transferred to the new site, and the first pilgrims began to arrive.

By 1986 it was decided to recast the statue in bronze, for there were some concerns that the one from the 1950s would not last long. This new representation of Our Lady was solemnly blessed at Cardiff Cathedral, before being sent round the Principality on a grand tour. On the Pentecost Sunday of that same year, Our Lady of the Taper was officially installed in Cardigan. It was also at this time that the site became the Welsh National Shrine of Our Lady. The Taper, which the Virgin Mother holds, had been blessed especially in Rome, by Pope John Paul II.

It's true to say that this place of pilgrimage is still relatively new, and Our Lady of the Taper has yet to become an integral part of the devotional life of Catholic Wales. It is, as a Shrine, far more popular in the South, and especially so within the Diocese of Menevia, than it is amongst Catholics in other parts of the country. The Holy Well and Shrine of St Winifred (see earlier post on St Beuno) remains a far more popular place of pilgrimage amongst the majority of the Welsh, as well as others. In fact, St Winifred's Well is referred to as the "Lourdes of Wales", such is it's magnetism and reputation for healing and miracles.

Hopefully, now that the Holy Father is to promote this beautiful devotion to Our Lady, the Shrine will become a great and popular place of pilgrimage - even to rival Walsingham?

For more information on Our Lady of the Taper, and the National Shrine, please visit the official website, here. It's especially nice to see that the parish priest and Rector, Fr Jason Jones, occasionally offers the Traditional Latin Mass!

[Picture note: Our Lady of the Taper (or of Cardigan). Source: Wikimedia Commons]

Cardinal Newman – a great prophet

Last night I attended a talk on Newman, hosted by the Friends of Westminster Cathedral. The speaker was Mgr Roderick Strange, Rector of the Beda College, Rome, and also an expert on John Henry, Cardinal Newman. In fact Fr Strange, who might be familiar to those who read the Credo page in the Times, published a book on the great English ecclesiastic in 2008, called John Henry Newman: A Mind Alive.

Mgr Strange is an excellent and very engaging speaker, and it was a delight to hear him share some of his reflections. The basics of Newman’s life, his Evangelical conversion, his academic career, his work within the Oxford Movement, his conversion to Catholicism, and his (sometimes quite trying) life as a Catholic, were all covered within 45 minutes – quite a feat! We were also invited to concentrate on some of Newman’s ideas, and his general vision. This included his desire to tread the via media not only within Anglicanism, but also as a Catholic. He tried to explain the faith in a reasoned and calm manner – not veering to the excesses or passions of those on either side of a particular divide or debate. Newman was also a keen proponent of the dialogue that should, and must, exist between faith and reason, or religion and secularism. He once said that he wanted to see intellectual laymen leaning how to be more devout, and pious ecclesiastics become more intellectually learned. He saw no state of war between science and religion, and the Darwinian revolution, which challenged Protestants, had no effect on his faith. In fact, Newman had already proposed a form of evolutionary theory in 1845 – whilst discussing the development of the Church, which could be interpreted as a theological “survival of the fittest”!

It was interesting to learn more about Cardinal Newman’s prophetic insights. Mgr Strange dwelt for some time on a sermon that Newman preached on the opening of St Bernard’s Seminary in 1873, called The Infidelity of the Future*. During this homily the Cardinal reflected on a future when England would be irreligious. He foresaw a time when the Protestant sects, such as the Church of England, the Methodists, and other Dissenters, would collapse, thus leaving the Catholic Church as the only witness to Christianity. Newman warned that this would be a dark and dangerous time to be a Catholic Christian – for British society, naturally prejudiced against Catholicism, would turn its irreligious guns on the Church. It would be dangerous, also, because a general understanding of Christianity will have disappeared from the lives of ordinary people – therefore, it would be nigh on impossible to engage in a rational, and calm, way with the Church’s detractors. In other sermons and letters, Newman added to his prophecy by warning that future persecutions of Catholicism by the irreligious would be far worse than anything seen previously – the troubles that St Athanasius or Pope St Gregory VII faced would be as nothing compared to the storms that a godless, and formerly Protestant, England would create. Another matter highlighted by Newman was the grave danger of public scandal – the Church, especially with the rise of newspapers, could end up being at the “mercy of the evil brother”, he said.

Listening to Fr Roderick Strange really enthused in me a desire to learn even more about John Henry Newman. It might be worthwhile for those of us who are Catholics, or Christians, to read his sermons, and letters – for what he has to say seems more than relevant to today’s world!

[Picture note: Mgr Roderick Strange before the Newman lecture at Westminster Cathedral, 11/05/10]

* Link to the sermon on the Newman Reader website.

Cameron on the Coalition

Here is part of an email I received today. It was sent to Conservative Party members from the Prime Minister & Leader of the Conservative Party, David Cameron. The email seeks to explain the agreement which helped form the coalition Government. It assures Tories that there won't be an amnesty for illegal immigrants, and no more hand-overs of power to the EU. It does not, though, propose a policy on immigration, or Europe. We can but hope, that the majority partner in the coalition (more specifically, Conservative MPs) will ensure big limits on immigration and EU meddling in British life, law, and politics!

Here is the second half of David Cameron's email: -

The [coalition] agreement commits the next government to a significantly accelerated reduction in the budget deficit, to cut £6 billion of government waste this financial year and to stop the jobs tax. The agreement also allows us to carry out key elements of the reform agenda we outlined in our manifesto - an agenda vital to turning our country round - including welfare and school reform. Moreover, we have protected our nuclear deterrent. And there will be no amnesty for illegal immigrants, nor the handover of any additional powers to the EU.

Of course, the agreement also reflects the key priorities and objectives of the Liberal Democrats. This includes fairer funding in education, a fairer tax system and political reform - including a referendum on changing the voting system to the alternative vote.

But the past few days have not just been about compromise. What was clear as talks progressed is the common ground between the Conservatives and Liberal Democrats. And that is displayed in this agreement, with our commitment to building a green economy, decentralising power and protecting civil liberties - including scrapping ID cards.

We campaigned on the belief that we're all in this together - and can only solve our problems together to build a stronger, more responsible society. I am confident that the coming together of two political parties to form one strong government marks a new era for Britain and for British politics. Now, let's get down to work.








Prime Minister & Leader of the Conservative Party

In the words of Bob Dylan: The times, they are a-changin'!

Is this the end for the Liberal Democrats?

We now know that the Conservatives have formed a coalition with the Liberal Democrats. The result of which is the apparent stability needed to form a new Government. Therefore, after Gordon Brown's resignation yesterday, the Queen asked David Cameron to become her twelfth UK Prime Minister - in all, Her Majesty, being head of state of several Commonwealth nations, has had 151 Prime Ministers. She also appointed Nick Clegg, leader of the Lib Dems, as her Deputy Prime Minister.

Most grass-roots members of both the Conservative and Liberal Democrat parties aren't that happy with this arrangement. The Tories could easily have formed a minority government, seeking Lib Dem support on a case-by-case basis. Cameron seems to have sold the family silver at a bargain basement price. Lib Dem supporters, on the other hand, hate the Tories with a passion - and will feel angry at seeing their MPs form a coalition with the party of Margaret Thatcher.


Because of their ascent to power, many are now asking: who are the Liberal Democrats, are they the Liberal Party, or some bizarre hybrid concocted in the hazy 80s?

Being a Welshman I can lay claim to the humorous phrase, "My father knew Lloyd George" (my grandfather actually did!). Also, coming from Anglesey, a constituency (officially known as Ynys Mon) which returned Megan Lloyd George* to Parliament from 1929 - 1951, long after the Liberal Party had become politically bankrupt, I can safely say that, like other non-socialist Welshmen, I know a bit about the Liberal Party.

One thing I know for sure is that the Liberal Democratic Party is not the Liberal Party! The latter was officially dissolved in 1988, as the former was being conceived! The Liberal Party, therefore, ceased to exist in the late 80s. In reality, it had died a thousand deaths well before then. When an official alliance was formed between the arguably much stronger Social Democratic Party (SDP) and the (weaker) Liberal Party in 1988, the latter continued to exist, in a questionable way, under the leadership of Michael Medowcroft (see here for the Liberal Party's website). This real Liberal Party, which seeks to continue the mission of those descended from the Whigs, is still alive and active, and even has a few local councillors.

It could easily be argued that the Liberal Democrats, who were also known as the Social and Liberal Democrats and the Democrats before adopting their new name (in 1989), are the real heirs of the SDP, an off-shoot of the old Labour Party. To equate the Lib Dems with the party and politics of Gladstone, Palmerston, and Asquith is not only incorrect, but also quite fanciful. It disheartens me, therefore, to hear supposed expert commentators, on the BBC or in the news media, claim that the Lib Dems are now in power for the first time since the Second World War (when Britain had a coalition government, comprising all the main political parties). The Lib Dems have never held political office within the national government. They have only been in existence for 21 years. Therefore, as we face a great economic crisis, and global calamity, our Government comprises a party that has never held office, and one that hasn't been in power since 1992! To add to the anxiety of our current situation, both parties are being lead by youths!

Here are some pertinent questions concerning the Coalition Government and the future of the Lib Dems: -

It would only be fair to point out that the Lib Dems have signed their death warrant by entering into a coalition with the Conservatives. It is, sadly, a sign of their immaturity, and incompetence as a party - for, if they cannot see how damaging this deal will be for them, how on earth are they expected to show foresight in handling the affairs of state?

For many years now the leader of the Lib Dems has had the privilege of being able to hold the Prime Minister to account - being granted three questions at Prime Minister's Question Time (PMQ) every Wednesday lunchtime. Now that Nick Clegg has become the Deputy Prime Minister, he will no longer be able to hold the ruling party to account. He has, in effect, forfeited his ability to question the Prime Minister in Parliament. Therefore, he has greatly reduced his public "air-time", and his previous pretence at being, on the whole, a politically objective leader.

When members of the various political parties are invited onto news programmes or Question Time great care has been made in the past to include a spokesperson from Labour, the Conservatives, and the Lib Dems. Now that the Lib Dems are a (very) junior member of the Government their appearances on such shows will have to end. We cannot have two representatives from the Government, and only one from the Opposition on balanced political TV debates and programmes. So, have the Lib Dems shot themselves in the foot (again) - for they will now have far less "air-time" in the mainstream media, and will become spokesmen for the Government (and, therefore, the Conservative Party)?

Nick Clegg has accepted the role of Deputy Prime Minister. What does that office entail? Well, it basically means that when the Prime Minister is away, ill, or abroad his Deputy will have to answer questions in the Commons on his behalf. Nick Clegg will therefore have to stand at the dispatch-box to defend David Cameron! Other than that, the bizarre, and relatively new, role of Deputy Prime Minister has no real function. Clegg will be, in effect, a minister without portfolio. A shrewd politician would have insisted on having a great office of state, or a big department within Government (i.e. the Home Office) - from where he might be able to wield power. Will Nick Clegg's seemingly deluded grasp for grand titles, with little power, backfire on him, and his party?

The Lib Dems have been, and are, primarily concerned with a single issue - they seem hell-bent on introducing proportional representation to the British electoral process. Of course, Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland already have a form of PR, but Westminster has always favoured the first-past-the-post system. As part of the coalition deal Nick Clegg was promised a referendum on electoral reform. This means that we, the British public, will be able to vote on whether or not we want PR. Both the Labour Party (reeling from defeat at the polls, and rejection by the Lib Dems) and the Conservatives (who can't stand the thought of doing away with first-past-the-post politics) will campaign against reform. This will probably result in a crushing defeat for the Lib Dems, as the majority of UK citizens will vote against their proposals. What then for the Lib Dems? When the people say "No!" to their single most important policy, will they have to dissolve, or beg to be annexed into one of the two bigger parties?

Also, it might be worth considering what will now happen in bi-elections, or, come to that, in general elections. Because one constituency couldn't elect an MP last week, as the UKIP candidate died a few days before the polls were opened, we will soon have the opportunity to see whether it's tenable for the coalition parties to stand against each other. Will we soon see either a candidate from the Lib Dems or one from the Conservatives (but not both) standing for election to Westminster? Surely, if this happens, the Lib Dems will be the greater losers.

So, we can safely say that the Lib Dems are not the Liberals - and that this ragamuffin party of breakaway socialists has just signed away its future. This, then, is very good news indeed! Cameron might not just be a pretty face, after all!? Of course, it could just be that the Conservative in Clegg** won out, and after using the Lib Dems to advance his political career he is merely pressing the self-destruct button for that party, and reverting to type?


[Picture note: Megan Lloyd George, one of UK's last Liberal MPs. Source: National Library of Wales]

*Megan Lloyd George later became a Labour politician, becoming an MP for Carmarthen until her death in 1966. Her brother, Gwilym, also switched political allegiances, eventually becoming a Tory, and even a Conservative cabinet minister in the 1950s. The end of the Liberal Party as a force in British politics can be dated to its abandonment by Lloyd George's children.

**Nick Clegg, who is cut from the same cloth as Cameron, was a member of the Conservative Association at Cambridge University. His family have several well-established connections within Conservatism, and he secured a cushy number in Europe on the recommendation of two Tory peers.

Is Evan "Dr Death" Harris in need of St Edmund's intercession?

Many of us rejoiced when the polls revealed that Dr Evan Harris, also known as "Dr Death" had lost his seat in Parliament at the 2010 General Election. Until last month he was the Liberal Democrat MP for the constituency of Oxford West and Abingdon. During his political career this man made a name for himself as a spokesman for the anti-faith and pro-death lobby. He keenly supported abortion, euthanasia, homosexuality, and stem-cell research. He was also a fierce opponent of faith-schools and rights of conscience for people of faith. It was so wonderful to see him ousted, especially so by Nicola Blackwood, a Conservative and a Christian! Well worth a Te Deum!

Unfortunately, the "humanist" and "rationalist" Dr Evan Harris seems to have lost his grip on reality - if, of course, he ever had it! Over the past few days he has been on our TV screens commenting on the current political situation. Nothing wrong with that, of course - every man has the right to express an opinion. The problem with these appearances in the media, though, is that he seems to think he's still an MP. He, like fellow Lib Dem loser, Lempit Opik, is down in Westminster at the moment, acting as if the election hadn't happened. There is no reason for either of these men to be stood on College Green, or to be walking about the streets of Westminster. They were not returned here by their constituents, they are no longer representatives of the people. Having said that, there is no law saying they shouldn't be in London, or, more specifically, in the Westminster area. It might have been a bit more dignified, though, had they gracefully accepted defeat, and moved on. Opik is trying to make a desperate name for himself as a comedian - and the BBC seems only too keen to employ his services as a "joker" (on Newsnight this evening, and on Have I Got News For You last Friday. At least he is trying to find a new career. Evan Harris, on the other hand, keeps popping into TV studios and onto news programmes as if he were somehow an official Lib Dem spokesman. Maybe he is? The fact is, though, he is not an elected political representative - he is not a Member of Parliament. So why does he still refer to Oxford West and Abingdon as "my constituency", and why does he constantly call Lib Dem MPs "my colleagues" - as opposed to "former constituency" and "former colleagues"? He doesn't have a constituency, he represents no-one, bar himself. The good people of Oxford West and Abingdon have sent him packing, they did not send him down to Westminster! Maybe this poor fellow has a reality problem? Could it be that Evan Harris is yet another (unintentional) witness to the fact that so-called "rationalists" are more prone to irrational behaviour than they'd care to admit?

Having mentioned the constituency of Oxford West and Abingdon, it might interest some to learn that a great English saint hails from the town of Abingdon. His name, St Edmund of Abingdon - also known as Edmund Rich, or Edmund of Canterbury. He was a reforming Archbishop of Canterbury and Cistercian monk during the early to mid 13th century. Although he had his disagreements with Rome, it was only a matter of six years before he was canonised. St Edmund's College, Ware, was placed under his patronage, as was the Diocese of Portsmouth. There are two great relics of St Edmund in England, both compose of his intact left and right fibulae. One is venerated in St Edmund's Shrine at St Edmund's Ware, whilst the other can be found in his Shrine Chantry at Westminster Cathedral (though, unfortunately, this is in the Crypt, therefore not open to the public). This relic rests close to the tombs of Cardinals Wiseman (who composed the anthem O Beate mi Edmunde, and had the saint's relic enshrined) and Manning (who led a pilgrimage to his Shrine at Ware in 1873). St Edmund's feast day is on 16 November - and it has been known for his relic to be exposed at Westminster Cathedral on this special day.

Let's offer to this holy man's prayers and protection the whole people of England, and the Diocese of Portsmouth (of which he is join-principal patron), as well as, of course, the good people of Oxford West and Abingdon!




The Anthem to St Edmund
(Also the anthem of St Edmund's College)

O Beate mi Edmunde,
O Beate mi Edmunde,
Sic pro me ad Filium Dei,
Cum Maria preces funde,
Cum Maria preces funde,
Ut per vos sim placens Ei

O my beloved Edmund,
in union with Mary, pour out your prayers for me
to the Son of God, so that through them,
we may always be found pleasing to Him

[Picture note: The altar of St Edmund's Chantry Chapel, Westminster Cathedral. St Edmund's relic is below the altar, in a gilded reliquary]

Mass of Rogation at Corpus Christi, Maiden Lane

I attended a Rogation Mass for the first time yesterday - after nearly 20 years as a Catholic. What better place to experience this grace than at Corpus Christi, Maiden Lane – that jewel of Catholicism which can be found just off the Strand. Every Monday evening this church hosts a Sung Mass in the extraordinary rite, and attracts a number of loyal devotees.

The major Rogation Day is held on 25 April, whereas the three minor ones are celebrated during the weekdays that lead up to the Ascension (Thursday). Of course, the over-zealous “reforms” that sprang from Vatican II did away with the ancient tradition of rogation days, and it is an even greater shame that the bishops of England and Wales have moved Ascension Day to the 7th Sunday in Easter!

Thankfully, the Latin Mass Society, amongst others, has managed to preserve the ancient traditions of the Church, as well as the traditional calendar and liturgy. It was such a privilege, therefore, to attend the Rogation Mass yesterday – a moving experience, a moment of special grace, and something I’m truly grateful for. The priest who celebrates the Latin Mass at Corpus Christi is a venerable soul, and discharges his duty at the altar with care and great reverence and love. It is apparent to all that this humble man seeks to be truly present to the Mystery unfolding at his hands, and through his lips. The servers are also obviously very diligent, and are fine examples of how to behave around the throne of Divine Majesty. The small schola provides excellent accompaniment, leading the congregation into the depth of prayer that Gregorian chant helps bring about. Of course, like all things touched by humanity, the liturgy isn’t perfect – the odd note might be missed, and an elderly server might stumble. On the whole, though, the Mass as celebrated at Corpus Christi on Mondays does lead one to agree wholeheartedly with Fr William Faber, who famously said that the (traditional) Catholic Mass was “the most beautiful thing this side of heaven.”

The term “rogation” comes form the Latin verb rogare, which means “to ask”. Many scholars tend to agree that the major Rogation Day, 25 April (which is also St Mark’s Day), corresponds to the day of the year when the pagan Romans would process through the fields in order to bless the crops. This day was then called Robigalia, named after the Roman god, Robigus. This diety was considered to be a malign force, and was, in fact, the personification of agricultural pestilence - he was a spirit the pagans sought to placate in order to secure a good harvest. The way the people went about pleasing Robigus was through sacrificing an animal (usually a dog), and by processing through the fields (using incense, bells, and various prayers and songs). It is quite possible that the early Christian Church in Rome adopted this day (thus "Christianising" it), as a time to call upon God’s blessing on the crops – a day when agrarian communities could abandon idolatry, and turn in prayer and supplication to the true God of heaven and earth.

St Mamertus, the Bishop of Vienne in Dauphiny, instituted the minor rogation days in the late 5th century. He instructed that the Monday, Tuesday, and Wednesday prior to Ascension Day should be semi-penitential days of fasting and prayer – with the aim of begging God to grant the avoidance of calamity and disaster within the diocese. In 511 the Council of Orleans decreed that these special rogation days should be observed throughout the whole of Gaul. It was only a matter of time before the Universal Church promoted these special days of grace, too. In 816 Pope Leo III introduced the minor rogation days to the Church in Rome. By the end of the first millennium these solemn days of prayer were being observed throughout Europe.

The Rogation liturgy started with the Litany of the Saints. This was beautifully done at Corpus Christi – with choir and people chanting the alternate parts. As Our Lady’s intercession was called upon the ministers and choir stood up and began the procession (with cross and acolytes) round the church. Of course, rural communities usually processed around the fields at this point – the three days of rogation providing ample time to visit the farms of a whole parish or manor. As happened yesterday in Maiden Lane, the litany would conclude with the proper psalms and collects – in all, the procession lasted about 30 minutes. There was a real sense that we were truly making an effort in asking God to avert His wrath, and grant His mercy to us (the congregation), and the world in which we live, and move, and have our being. One really felt drawn into contemplating the Divine Majesty – justly feeling inadequate and small, as if like a small child, before the Creator of heaven and earth. The violet vestments helped highlight the penitential nature of the liturgy – a reminder that, even in the great season of Eastertide, we are but sinners dependent upon God's grace.

The Rogation Mass itself concentrated on the theme of prayer as a powerful and efficacious tool. The epistle coming from James 5: 16-20 – which calls on Christians to confess their sins, and remain in continual prayer, like Elias, who “prayed that it may not rain upon the earth.” The Gospel, from Luke 11: 5 – 13, had at its heart that most powerful and joyful message: “For everyone that asketh receiveth; and he that seeketh findeth; and to him that knocketh it shall be opened.”

What a shame that the “modern” Church has lost this great treasure of the liturgical year. How wonderful it would be to see rogation processions in parishes once more! There is nothing to stop these ceremonies being celebrated in the new rite, so one really must wonder, what was that fissure through which the smoke of Satan infected the Church during the 1960s and 70s? Why did the Church throw away its finest possessions? It’s time to heal the damage, and restore dignity to the Bride of Christ - we can but pray that Pope Benedict XVI will further aid this process.

On a slightly sadder, and more human, note… After Mass, and thanksgiving, I decided to go and thank the priest and servers. I even thought of donating some well-deserved funds to the LMS. But, as I reached the sacristy, and as I was about to speak, the door slammed shut in my face! So much for “to him that knocketh it shall be opened”! One was left wondering whether that description of the sometimes too cliquey Latin Mass Society might be true after all: “The Mass we love, with the people we hate”? This is a rather unfortunate saying, and one I don't really believe. Also, I try my best never to hate, so will therefore keep my heart open for another opportunity to show my gratitude! Who knows, one day the door might be opened to me at last!?

[Picture note: Rogation Mass, the beginning of the Litany of the Saints, Corpus Christi (Maiden Lane), 10/05/10; taken with mobile phone camera]

The real political scandal

Forget about the expenses crisis of a few months ago, for we are now really seeing the seedier side of politics - as the leader of the Lib Dems, like a power-crazed harlot, is intoxicated by the babbling promises of the dirty old men who lead the Conservatives and Labour. All the three main political parties appear more than happy to renege on election promises so as to secure some semblance of power. It's now an accepted fact of modern-day life that politicians are unable to accept responsibility for anything that they do which might appear to be immoral, illogical or corrupt - so the fault for the current situation we find ourselves in is conveniently, and repeatedly, placed at the feet of the "British electorate".

Nick Clegg strutts about as if he and his dishevelled party had won the 2010 General Election, and has no qualms in holding the other two parties, and the British people, to ransom. Playing hard to get with both the Conservative and Labour Party makes him seem like a deluded teenager who's suddenly found that he's become desirable, and has two 6th Form girls fighting for his attention - not realising that both vixens are using him like the dope he is! Clegg knows that most people in the UK couldn't be bothered about reforming our electoral system. Over 75% of us voted against his party, and therefore its main election promise of supplanting "first past the post" with "proportional representation". Risking economic stability and strong government for the sake of an irrelevant issue could, and probably will, backfire quite spectacularly for the Lib Dems. Not only does power corrupt, but it seems to blind, too!

All three main parties, whilst vying for dominance, claim that all they're trying to do is secure "the national interest". Of course, thinking that most people are utterly stupid, these poor politicians guess we're all going to swallow this line. As far as David Cameron is concerned the "national interest" requires that what the nation voted for, namely his own Party's manifesto, is irrelevant! It is completely patronising to tell the electorate what's best for us, especially whilst seeming so desperate to secure the right to form a government. The Labour Party, too, has suddenly found itself more interested in proportional representation than their other political policies - even though this electoral reform wasn't really mentioned by them during the electoral campaign!

To see Gordon Brown announce his desire to step down as leader of the Labour Party (not immediately, of course!), so as to attract the attention of the potty Liberals is just sickening. It appears that he is unable to accept defeat, and unwilling to listen to the electorate. Like the Nanny State they created, our washed-out and defunct Labour ministers (some of whom are no longer MPs) are visiting various television studios to tell us that they know what's best for the country (which, conveniently, is the opposite of what the nation wants) - so, to hell with "democracy"!

Just as repulsive as Brown's announcement was the sight of William Hague running out of the Palace of Westminster this evening to proclaim that the Conservatives really, really, love Nick Clegg and will give him whatever he wants (as long as he promises to be theirs). It was despicable to see the man who could be our next Foreign Secretary begging the Lib Dems to get into bed with him and his cohort of desperadoes. If this is how quickly the Conservatives can ditch their principles and policies, then goodness alone knows whether they're anywhere near being able to offer "strong" government.

The media, fiddling along to the spin-doctors' tune, constantly repeat the refrain, "this is what you, the electorate, wanted" (a BBC correspondent actually said this at the end of his report today). The blame, it seems, rests with the people - not with the shoddy policies of the three main parties, policies that failed to attract the majority of voters. Also, doesn't it seem odd to blame a whole "people", as if the millions who voted in the Election somehow colluded and plotted in order to bring about a hung parliament? It's my guess that most people, like me, were actually voting for their party in the hope that they'd win? I did want a Conservative Government - I do not want a weak coalition, whereby the jokers are left holding the all the aces! Having said that, in a world of fairy-dust and make-believe I'd much rather have had the really radical UKIP form the next Government - but that's another story! To suggest that the whole population of the British Isles went about electing a hung parliament is just plain stupid. Democracies are more often than not like pin-ball machines, or dice - we just cast our lots, and the pieces fall where they will. It makes no sense. In that sense, therefore, democracy is dangerous - if not lunatic. To hand power to millions of individuals, all of whom have radically different agendas, is tantamount to recklessness. Power shared amongst 40 million minds and hearts equals no real power for the individual at all. Democracy is an illusion, which neuters the masses who are tricked into thinking and believing that they hold the real balance of power. Those who form opinions, those who can sway the intellectually challenged, or those who happen to live in the handful (about 120) of marginal seats hold far more power than most. For the Greeks, of course, democracy was a gift that only free men and the educated enjoyed. Until very recently our electoral system here in the UK was very similar - the right to vote rested with men and the educated classes. Surely there is an argument that any real reform of the electoral system should limit the right to vote to those truly worthy of it? Would we be better off if voters had to hold at least one university degree before skipping off to the polling station (on time!)? Who knows, but it could be argued that when millions are given the right to elect governments democracy begins to become dangerous, if not undemocratic - it becomes "mob rule" and, therefore, a far more subtle way of controlling the population!

Throughout all the turmoil of not really having a new government, life goes on. The Queen is still the head of state, and she continues to rule over us. She still has the right, if she were courageous enough, to elect a Prime Minister and a Government of her own choosing. She could send in the Army (which swears an oath to her) and dissolve Parliament, proclaim rule by Divine Right, and take us back to better times... We can but dream. I doubt, especially in the present climate, that there'd be many roundheads to oppose her! We poor plebs would hardly notice any drastic difference in our day to day lives where the Monarch to assume absolute rule. Bread and milk would appear for breakfast, offices would open at 9am, schools might even improve, and the police would probably keep better law and order. The civil service would draft the necessary paper-work needed for State bureaucracy, and the tax-man would continue to collect funds. We would all rejoice at one major difference, though: without politicians, parliaments and electoral systems the State would be much, much cheaper to run!

Build a Legacy of Peace event at Westminster Cathedral

It’s two years since 16-year-old Jimmy Mizen was tragically killed in a baker’s shop in Lee, south-east London. This young man had just celebrated his birthday the day before he was randomly attacked by a teenage thug. Yesterday would have been his eighteenth birthday.

Our hearts as a nation went out to his parents and family when we heard that this young man had been taken so cruelly from them. They, in turn, dealt with the violent death of their son with dignity, courage and love. Jimmy’s parents are Catholic, and their response to their son’s death has both been an inspiration for others and a witness to Christian love in action.

Since the murder of their son Barry and Margaret Mizen have founded the Jimmy Mizen Foundation – to provide support and hope for others, especially the young, who have been affected by violent youth crime. They are also working hard to promote the virtuous ways of peace and forgiveness, as opposed to the all too violent and vengeful life teenagers are often exposed to on our streets. This is a worthy cause – and one, I’m sure, that would benefit from prayer and personal sacrifices.

Today, at 3pm, the Mizens will be joined in Westminster Cathedral by H.R.H. Prince of Wales and other families of victims of youth crime for a special service. The Archbishop of Westminster will preside over the liturgy, and preach a homily.

There were many police officers outside Westminster Cathedral this lunchtime, and security for the event has been very tight. It’s a shame, though, that there aren’t more policemen on the beat, especially in those places where teenagers congregate with the view of attacking other children and young adults.

Yesterday’s bulletin from the Brompton Oratory touched on the subject of “peace” with the following words: -

“In our times, when we use the word ‘Peace’, we use it mostly to describe a state of affairs where there is the absence of war or conflict, whether that conflict is between nations, ethnic groups, gangs of bored teenagers, political parties or maybe more especially between members of the family… All of us have reasons to crave for an absence of conflict, but Jesus is offering his disciples something more [“Peace I bequeath you, my own peace I give you”]. He offers a peace that is not simply the absence of conflict, or even a tranquillity of spirit, like we would experience if we spent time in meditation. He offers us a peace that the world cannot give, a peace we can’t find on earth, and that only God can give us… In the Lord Jesus rising from the dead, that biblical peace [a state of complete well-being, fullness of health, wealth, and profound happiness] is offered us as an everlasting legacy… not as a blessing for the future but as a gift to enjoy in the present moment… It is an other-worldly peace, because it comes from outside the world. Children go on suffering from emotional shell-shock, gangs fight each other, social disturbance continues, wars are still fought, but the Risen Lord assures his disciples that beyond all this, they are at peace with God.”

May the Mizen family be filled with this peace at all times, and may God bless them in their important mission. May all families of the victims of knife-crime and street violence receive the consolation of the Holy Spirit. And, may all young people and children killed in anger or violence rest in peace.