Monday, 21 March 2011

Soup-runs for rough-sleepers outside Westminster Cathedral: What would Jesus do?

The problem of rough-sleepers around Westminster Cathedral has been in the news recently, due to the fact that Westminster City Council is proposing a bye-law which would ban soup-runs around the Cathedral's piazza. Needless to say, many people have commented on this issue, and there have also been protests in the press and on the streets, with most voices opposing the Council's seemingly harsh measures against a vulnerable group. Sometimes, though, it is easy to forget that homelessness leads to social problems that impact on the wider community, which the Council has a duty to address. It is also easy to forget that soup-runs do not really help the homeless in the long-term - as most professionally run homeless charities and organisations point out.

Westminster Cathedral has links to two homeless charities, which are amongst the best providers of care and front-line assistance for street-sleepers in London. The first is The Passage, which is based round the corner from the Cathedral, and which feeds, clothes and supports hundreds of homeless men and women every day. The other is The Cardinal Hume Centre, based next to the Cathedral's chapel-of-ease on Horseferry Road. It, too, provides a specialist service for those who find themselves on society's bottom-rung. Westminster Cathedral, and its parishioners and supporters, should be proud of these two organisations - especially The Passage, which is run by the Daughters of Charity of St Vincent de Paul, but is also a major part of the Cathedral's mission to the homeless.

The fact of the matter is that there is sufficient provision for the homeless around Westminster Cathedral's immediate vicinity. Not only does The Passage provide help and advice for rough-sleepers, but the services it offers are extremely professional, as well as being grounded in the Gospel's call to feed the hungry and clothe the naked. Of course, the Gospel also promotes the dignity of every person, as well as the need for us all to assume responsibility, as best we can, for our individual lives.

Many groups come into Westminster every week to run the nightly soup-runs outside the Cathedral. There is some kind of rota, from what I gather, in which members of mainly evangelical churches take it in turns to drive into central London from the well-heeled suburbs to hand out food, clothes and hot drinks. As far as I know, these well-meaning people do not offer practical advice and have no real understanding of the housing, medical or support services on offer in Westminster. One assumes that these people return home after off-loading their sandwiches, take comfort in either reading a passage from the Guardian or the NIV Bible, and then go to sleep, content in the knowledge that they have saved some poor unfortunates. Those who have been fed and entertained by the middle-class visitors head off, with a full belly but not really motivated to change or get better. This is called "creating a dependency" - it is totally at odds with the Gospel message, in which every man and woman is called to be responsible for his or her own life, and in which those who help do so in order that others might then reach a place where they, in turn, can move on and become helpers themselves.

"Do you want to get better?"

Many years ago I suffered from a very debilitating addiction to alcohol - still having health problems to this day. But, thank God, I at least managed to move on from dependency to a substance and a way of life which was killing me and causing much havoc and bother to those around me. After struggling for many years with my addiction, which even led to homelessness and severe physical illness - I was given three months to live - I eventually found the help I needed after going on pilgrimage to Walsingham. Nothing supernatural happened - I simply heard the Gospel being proclaimed in a way that caused me to ask myself: do I really want to get better, or am I content being dependent on others?

The Gospel passage being read at that Mass in Walsingham was John 5:1-16, which tells the story of the man at the pool called Bethesda, who was told by Jesus to "pick up your sleeping-mat and walk". This poor man had been living as a rough-sleeper by this pool in Jerusalem for 38-years. There were many other sick and lame people at the pool, and many other homeless men. Whoever was first into the water each day was supposed to be healed - but this man hadn't been able to find someone to help him reach the pool in time, even though he had been there for 38-years! When Jesus heard this man's story, he turned to him and asked, "Do you want to get better?" Now, every time I had previously heard this Gospel being read the priest or deacon had invariably made Our Lord sound a bit lame - "gentle Jesus, meek and mild". But, that particular day in Walsingham, the priest read Jesus's words as if Our Lord was rather frustrated with man: " Do you want to get better?" In other words, Jesus was challenging him - and if the Gospel doesn't challenge us now and again, then something's wrong. He was basically asking the man, seeing that he'd managed to sit on his behind doing nothing for 38-years, whether or not he actually wanted to get better, as it seemed that the rough-sleeper didn't really want to change. As the priest at Walsingham said during the homily, it was probably quite a nice, stress-free life, sitting on the pavement every day, chatting with the same old faces, having a drink, begging for a few pennies. The man had become dependent on others, he was not reaching his full-potential, he was actually "sinning" (as Jesus later told him).

When I heard this Gospel in the Slipper Chapel that day, something inside me clicked - and I turned to Our Lord and said, "Yes, Lord! I want to get better!" Jesus did not miraculously heal the man at the pool called Bethesda, he merely told him to pick up his sleeping bag and walk - in other words, Our Lord told him - and me - to take responsibility for our own lives, to do something useful, to stop taking the easy, co-dependent route. This is important: Christians should help people to help themselves - otherwise they are merely using others to make themselves feel nice inside. The homeless can sometimes be an easy target for do-gooders - those who think they're helping, but who are actually disabling people by not challenging them, or really getting to the root cause of their problems.

"I have come that you may have life - and have it to the full"

I am utterly convinced that Our Lord does not want Christians to hinder others from reaching their full potential. It is easy to hand out a sandwich and feel good about ourselves, but how easy is it to admit that we might be colluding in keeping others trapped in a vicious circle by doing this? How easy is it to challenge others, to really spend time with them so that the root cause of their problems are tackled and they can become constructive members of society once more? Admittedly, it isn't easy to let others reach rock-bottom - that point where they can truly say, "I've had enough, I want to get better!" But, no-one will change unless they want to, and they won't ever reach that stage if others are constantly colluding to keep them "safe" or "comfortable".

Catholic organisations like The Passage help people achieve independence, not dependency. The Sisters, workers, and volunteers at The Passage try to encourage rough-sleepers to choose the options that will really help them find a house, a job, the right benefits, medical aid, and so on. They don't just hand out food or clothes, but they go on to challenge people to seek the help they need, to see their own worth, to love themselves, to love others, to reach a goal, to rebuild relationships, to give up booze or drugs. The Passage, it seems, tries to help others reach the point where they can help themselves. In doing so, they are acting as Jesus would!

In response to Westminster City Council's proposed by-law, The Passage issued this statement, it makes interesting reading, and is totally Christian in its approach:
The Passage’s mission is to provide resources which encourage, inspire and challenge homeless people to transform their lives.

We believe in a hand up, (as opposed to a handout) approach, and our work focuses on addressing the root causes that has led to someone becoming homeless, (e.g. addiction issues, etc), in the first place, to enable that person to address these issues and break the cycle of homelessness once and for all.
In relation to soup runs; The Passage is currently working with those who provide these services to see if there is a better way to serve those on the streets; by bringing such services inside to give people some dignity, (as opposed to having to queue in the outside elements for free food), and to look at how members of the wider community can support our work, (and that of other agencies) in finding other ways of preventing and dealing with homelessness. Whilst The Passage understands the frustration of Westminster City Council in dealing with the huge number of soup runs that arrive into Westminster from outside the borough every week, The Passage would rather see a solution that comes out of dialogue rather than legislation, and we will continue to work towards that goal.
With regard to legislation around rough sleeping for a large area in south Westminster; The Passage is proud of its work with many partner agencies, including our work with Westminster City Council, in making huge strides in dealing with the issue of rough sleeping. However, The Passage is not supportive of a byelaw to deal with rough sleeping, no matter how well intentioned.
In other words, The Passage seems to agree with the motivation behind the proposed bye-law, but thinks that legislation is probably too draconian. It wants to give "a hand up" not "a hand out". The Catholic charity, would also much prefer to enter into dialogue with those ad hoc groups that descend on Westminster every evening (rather than legislate against them in some "big state" kind of way). This process of dialogue would hopefully help these organisations realise that there might be a better way of serving the homeless - a more dignified way at that!

The area around Westminster Cathedral can be messy at the best of times, but the added problem of discarded food and human waste is a real concern. Sadly, many of the homeless people who gather around the Cathedral have severe problems - mainly to do with their addictive or violent behaviour. Sometimes, these issues spill into the Cathedral - with fights breaking out at the back, or individuals coming in during Mass to abuse the worshippers and throw beer about the place. The nightly soup-runs, which attract rough-sleepers to the piazza, add to the anti-social problems in the area - which isn't really fair on the shop-traders, the residents or the worshippers at the Cathedral. Needless to say, the evangelicals and others (some of whom are other Catholics) who come all the way from Richmond or Blackheath to hand out sandwiches on the piazza don't take these things into consideration - they probably don't see that as their problem!

Jesus never used others just to make himself look good - he really wanted them to be better people, to get well, to move on, to convert, to give up sin, to change! Sometimes, I fear, those who think they're helping rough-sleepers by handing out a sandwich and a cup-of-tea at midnight on Westminster Cathedral's piazza are actually doing the opposite - they are merely colluding to keep the poor, the sick and the vulnerable dependent upon their "charity".

Update 24/3/11: It seems that the Council has backed down from its proposed legislation, whilst many homelessness groups that descend on Westminster Cathedral's piazza have also agreed to help rough sleepers in a more constructive and dignified way. See here.

25 comments:

Genty said...

Another balanced and thought-provoking piece. I have never worked out why there was an explosion of homeless in the 1980s. It couldn't, and can't, all be down to economics.
Soup runs, though worthy, are not helping in the long-run as you say. I think those involved are genuinely trying to help but have been caught up in this non-judgemental frame of mind which doesn't take the rough sleepers beyond a pat on the head and the status quo.
What's needed is more places like The Passage and the Cardinal Hume Centre where the homeless can be helped to heal and regain their dignity. They wouldn't always be 100 per cent successful but it would be a good place for the Council to start and to develop, instead of just issuing edicts.
The problem around the Cathedral is manifest and the rough sleepers can sometimes be verbally abusive. Once, during Mass at the sign of peace, it wasn't my hand which was groped by a homeless man. Obviously, I couldn't yell out as the choir was already at the Agnus Dei and I didn't want to frighten two young children with their mother close by.
Just beforehand, I had heard a puzzling splashing in one of the side chapels and later drew my own conclusions.
All I could do after the assault was to lead the man calmly by the hand to the security office where I gave the guard who should have been patrolling "what for". Naturally, the perp scarpered.
Quite surreal, really.

Laurence England said...

Christ specifically commanded us to feed the hungry in whom He himself is hidden. It really is as simple as that.

We are not called to judge, either. Unless we are great and very humble Saints, we cannot we lift them out of their sins. God alone can do that.

Compassion, mercy, generosity to the poor. These are hallmarks of many of our canonized Saints. You want to preach the Gospel? Well, that is preaching the Gospel. If you must use words, then do so as well.

diddleymaz said...

the reason for the explosion in homelessness was the shutting of so many institutions and mass unemployment and benefit cuts to teenagers. :(

Tim said...

RS you needn't post my comment or reply to it but I beg you to re-read and reconsider your original post - especially the fourth and the last paragraphs. To speculate that those giving food to the homeless are doing so for the motives you suggest is gravely unjust and the sneering language of the fourth paragraph in particular edifies no-one.

Patricius said...

You raise some interesting points,however, recalling the "Building stable communities" scandal with which the Westminster council was associated a few years ago, I should be reluctant to regard any initiative regarding the homeless on their part with anything other than deep unease. As for "welfare dependancy"- I am all for it. There are some very high class welfare dependants within the City of Westminster!

A Reluctant Sinner said...

@ Laurence England

As you will have noticed, I shifted my opinions slightly since commenting on this issue on your blog a few weeks ago.

This change came about after some reflection and a concerted effort to look at the issue from the perspective of those who try and help the homeless within Westminster Cathedral's own parish.

As you know, The Passage does feed and clothe the hungry and sees Christ in those whom they care for. But, one of my favourite chapters in Scripture is Mt 25, the Sheep and Goats at Judgement. As you will know from the text, Jesus specifically refers to "the least of my brothers" - in other words, the least amongst the brethren, the Christian community. To suggest that Our Lord appears as a drunk or a drug addict comes, I think, from a misunderstanding of the passage. I myself have come across Christians in need of a place to stay, and have put them up in my own house. Some people, like myself a few years ago, end up on the streets because of sinful lives - that need to change for the better.

A Reluctant Sinner said...

@ Patricius

That's why I am against the proposed bye-law, even if I know that the Council, this time, is trying to engage with the issue after receiving advice from homelessness charities.

The bye-law itself is draconian and unworkable. In fact, the Council already has powers to move people from the piazza as it is - so need no new laws.

A Reluctant Sinner said...

@ Tim

Thank you for your comment.

I agree that my language isn't the best, and apologise if it causes offence.

I do believe, though, that people can act in one way, with perfectly good motivations, but might fail to see / address any underlying motivations. Many of those - if not all - who come to hand out food around the Cathedral tend to be outsiders - not having any real perspective on the issues that surround homelessness in Westminster.

There are poor families here who have been waiting for a council home for 25 years or more. It really isn't fair on them that people come in from all over the country / world and camp our on the streets with the hope of finding a house (which is practically impossible). The best thing someone could do for those who find themselves homeless in central London is give them a ticket back home - where the council probably have enough homes for their needs.

A Reluctant Sinner said...

@ Patricuis

PS - "welfare dependency". There is nothing wrong with receiving the benefits one is entitled to. I believe in the welfare state's ability to help those in need. I myself have been helped by it.

But, the problem with many homeless people is that they choose to opt out of any state help - to live on the streets. Organisations like The Passage try and get people onto the housing ladder - which means becoming dependent on objective help.

It can be dangerous, though, for people to become dependent on others to the point that they themselves become dis-empowered... That's all I was saying.

James said...

"the problem with many homeless people is that they choose to opt out of any state help"

"It can be dangerous, though, for people to become dependent on others to the point that they themselves become dis-empowered"

So it's dangerous for them to be dependent on a soup run, they should be dependent on the state instead?

A Reluctant Sinner said...

@ James

The state will usually require that those receiving help must also actively look for work, and be responsible - otherwise they lose their benefits.

Also, being dependent on other people in this "soup-run" type of way can lead to a situation where the one being helped is kept down whilst the ones helping aren't really helping in the long-run.

Churches can afford to pay for a cup-of-tea or a sandwich for a hundred people - but could they afford to pay for housing, re-training, alcohol treatment services, probation needs, medical care, etc for all these people who are in genuine need? Somehow, I doubt it very much.

The function of a the state in a modern society is to help those in need by giving them the resources necessary to become better citizens - or ones that can repay society in some way, at the very least.

As The Passage says, "hand-ups" not "hand-outs".

Also, I must stress that the situation around Westminster Cathedral is very unique - and does not reflect or represent homelessness as seen in other parts of the country. Most major cities and towns have homeless people. A town such as Norwich (pop. 120,000) might have 15 rough-sleepers at most. The area around Westminster Cathedral (South Westminster and Victoria), though, has a population of about 8,000 and about 200 homeless people. It is disproportionate, and unsustainable. Many people think that the citizens of Westminster are wealthy enough to cover this burden - but the truth of the matter is that South Westminster and Victoria are very mixed areas - with lots of impoverished families as it is. If genuinely homeless people went back to the towns and cities they came from, the chances are that they would be offered accommodation much quicker than if they waited for a house / flat in Westminster - the whole local authority area (pop. 200,000) has a 28-year waiting list for council homes!

Laurence England said...

"What you are before God, that you are and nothing more."

St Francis of Assisi

You cast judgement upon those outside the Cathedral at your peril. No, they are not 'angels', but then neither are you or I. Don't turn to the Dark side!

A Reluctant Sinner said...

@ Laurence England

I am merely supporting The Passage and the Cathedral in their mission to the homeless. From reading the statement and my post, you will notice that I now agree that their approach to the particular problem around Westminster is the best.

I do not judge anyone bar myself. That doesn't mean that I can observe the fact that most of those who are homeless and who congregate outside the Cathedral have alcohol and drug misuse problems. St Paul said that the drunken cannot enter the kingdom of Heaven (cf. Cor 6;9).

I still very much agree with you that Christians have a duty to feed the hungry and clothe the naked - as St Martin of Tours did. But, these instances of Christian charity are best done in secret and individually. Significant social problems caused by anti-social behaviour and an overwhelming homelessness problem need to be dealt with in ways that are sometimes best served by professional organisations.

LOL. I pray God I never will turn to the Dark side. Although, fully admit that I myself have one!

Webmaster Gareth said...

A friend of mine started a soup run, but they go on to house people, get them off drugs, and they also promote Catholicism at every juncture. To ignore any of these is to leave the homeless in a world of sin which many cant escape.

Laurence England said...

Yes, they are on drink and drugs, but you don't know what has happened to them. Many are the victims of abuse, for example, in childhood, desperately trying to numb their pain. Christ is present in their sufferings. They are carrying a heavy Cross. Until you have walked a mile in their shoes, you cannot just dismiss them as 'sinners'. That would be a terrible betrayal of the Gospel. The Gospel teaches that we are ALL sinners.

shadowlands said...

'Sometimes, I fear, those who think they're helping rough-sleepers by handing out a sandwich and a cup-of-tea at midnight on Westminster Cathedral's piazza are actually doing the opposite - they are merely colluding to keep the poor, the sick and the vulnerable dependent upon their "charity".'

You reflect on that next time you tuck into alate night snack/sarnie and a steaming hot mug of cocoa, all under a nice posh Westminster roof!
I used to do the soup run in Birmingham City centre, for some of the folk it was an outward witness to them, that Christ had not forgotten them, even if society had.
As for people chucking beer around the Cathedral, they are obviously not alcoholics, beer is precious and not for chucking around, trust me!

A Reluctant Sinner said...

@ Shadowlands

Please read the post in its entirety.

You'd realise that I was homeless myself once, as the result of alcoholism.

As for a "posh Westminster roof" - well, if you ever lived in Westminster you'd realise that (as mentioned in the post) there are enormous numbers of poor families that live in Westminster. Their roofs, like mine, are not what any sane person would call posh.

I know that this issue causes a lot of anger for those who don't like to think that they might be colluding with the vulnerable in keeping them down, and by dis-empowering them, but it is one that should be aired. As nearly all the professional homelessness charities, including The Passage and the founder of the Big Issue, point out, the best way to help the homeless is to help them help themselves.

Taking responsibility, even in little things, can be an important key to freedom.

Laurence England said...

Oh you sound just like John A. Bird. "Oh I was once wretched and homeless, a drinker, but then I..."

Pass me the bucket.

Laurence England said...

"I thank You, O Lord, that I am not like [insert particular kind of sinner here________ ]"

Good grief! I'm starting to wonder if reformed alcoholics are the worst kind of alcoholics. I am sure that when you were feeling at your lowest, you did not particularly begrudge a nice old lady coming up to you with a soup and a bun and asking if you were okay.

Sandy Grounder said...

I think it is a question of balance. Handouts have their place. I am familiar with an indoor soup kitchen run by the Legion of Mary. 365 evenings per year it provides free food to anyone, homeless or not, who calls in. No questions, no names, no national insurance numbers, no assessments. Apart from anything else, given the problems many have with benefits not being paid on time or suspended altogether, it seems to me this is a valuable, and wholly Christian service. Professional organisations simply would not do this.


There is a danger of creating dependency that needs to be guarded against, but that is a problem with any helping service, including state run services, and not confined to soup runs.

It seems to me that it is right to say that the question of disempowering people should be aired and it certainly seems that services in Westminster could be better co-ordinated.

A Reluctant Sinner said...

@ Laurence

I think that soup runs have a very important function - especially when it comes to outreach and filling in the gaps. Of course, I have to emphasise that in Westminster there are so many soup runs that they've started to have a detrimental effect. It's as if everyone wants to come all the way to Westminster to do their outreach that they've forgotten about the people on their own doorsteps.

Also, because of the particular nature of homelessness in South Westminster / Victoria, those organisations such as The Passage offer the best support. Their approach might sound touch, but tough love often works.

But, of course, I know that my sobriety (and therefore ability to sleep in a warm bed every night) relies on two things: a) God's grace and b) a personal commitment to try and avoid sin / bad behaviour. I will always be an alcoholic - and am still repenting of the many manifold and evil sins I committed as a drunk - often whilst I blamed others (childhood traumas, etc) for my choice to act upon an addiction (which is ultimately selfish, and egotistical = pride).

Sometimes, those who have been there, Like John A Bird, are best suited to offer advice on how to move on to a better state of life?

I can assure you that my prayer always is "I thank you Lord for having allowed me to be a sinner". I wouldn't know the sweet taste of grace and freedom otherwise. I also go to confession about once every other week, and seem to surprise myself with a new sin every time!

A Reluctant Sinner said...

PS - Westminster City Council is only proposing to ban the soup runs immediately around the Cathedral - all the ones around Trafalgar Sq, Mayfair, Oxford St, Marylebone, and so on can continue. Having said that, like The Passage, I don't agree with draconian legislation - dialogue and encouragement usually lead to better results.

A Reluctant Sinner said...

@ Sandy Groundner

Exactly. The Passage is a professional Catholic service, but also welcomes all to go and be fed. They also feed people inside, which (as they themselves suggest) is a bit more dignified than handing out food on the street. It is that balance that I'm saying would / does work best in an area such as Westminster Cathedral's piazza. I feel we should support the Cathedral's homelessness mission, i.e. The Passage. But, having said that, others can, of course, provide street help and ministries - but at the moment there are so many groups descending on the piazza every week that the homeless are a) being given mixed messages and b) are being "rescued" from reaching that point (rock bottom) where most (except the extremely suicidal, who need intervention) would eventually say "enough's enough, I want to change".

shadowlands said...

'but at the moment there are so many groups descending on the piazza every week that the homeless are a) being given mixed messages and b) are being "rescued" from reaching that point (rock bottom) where most (except the extremely suicidal, who need intervention) would eventually say "enough's enough, I want to change". '


I think people are missing the main point here, it's not so much about the free food, (altho for an emaciated alcoholic in withdrawel it just might be)it's the sense of being noticed and cared for, loved even, perhaps for the only time that week and it is in giving that, that we show Christ to each other.
As you say, you are now in recovery so your thinking is clearer, a street dweller in the throes of addiction would spend most of his mental time stressing about the next drink, or just loathing himself when the alcohol is beginning to withdraw. Their self worth would start the day at rock bottom. Alcoholics and addicts start every morning at rock bottom (I know).
You managed to get to Walsingham, received a moment of clarity during the sermon, that's a fantastic miracle and I praise God you did, but how many of the people you speak of will receive that chance, truly?
Didn't Jesus say the poor would always be with us?
I remember, when I used to do the Brum soup run, a homeless man on crutches, a scary looking fella demanded somebody gave him a hug. He banged his crutch down on our table. All the guys were freaked out, they didn't know what he was capable of. I just put my arms around him. he calmed down immediately, but then all the other gentlemen of the road started demanding hugs and I got in trouble with the parish priest haha!

Are you suggesting the way to give the homeless a 'moment of clarity' is to withdraw some of the soup runs? Considering this moment is a gift from God, perhaps the Cathedral should hold services for the homeless, where they might get to hear the still small voice that you did. That would be a greater use of God's house than people chucking beer around. Maybe the service could be in the Cathedral's piazza?
Who would preach such a sermon?
A recovering homeless alcoholic priest maybe? that could be you, maybe, one day( sorry if you are already a priest, I don't know)?
God bless and remember, it's only one day at a time, but there are no days off!

Anonymous said...

Jesus wouldn't have been a Catholic haha