The reality of the Church's relationship with science is far from that portrayed by Catholicism's lazy-minded, secularist detractors. In fact, it could be argued that the Catholic Church is the one that has constantly been reason and science's best advocate - as Pope Benedict XVI recently said, quoting a medieval Byzantine Emperor, "Not to act reasonably, not to act with logos is contrary to the nature of God." It is also true to say that some of the world's greatest scientists, including Galileo himself, have often been active members of the Church. In fact, here is a list of some of those Catholics, most of whom were priests, who have made enormous contributions to the world of science: -
Roger Bacon (founder of the modern scientific method); Robert Grosseteste (father of scientific experimentation); Basil Valentine (father of modern chemistry); Nicolaus Copernicus (proponent of heliocentrism); Giovanni Battista Riccioli (leading astronomer and the first person to measure the rate of acceleration of a freely falling body); Athanasius Kircher (father of Egyptology, first man to view microbes, and founder of modern geography); Václav Prokop Diviš, Giuseppe Toaldo and Luigi Galvini (discoverers of various types of electricity); Jean Mabillon (founder of palaeography); Marin Mersenne (father of acoustics); René Just Haüy (founder of chrystallography); Jean-Antoine Nollet (who discovered the phenomenon of osmosis in natural membranes); Louis Pasteur (genius of mirco-biology); Francesco Lana de Terzi (father of aeronautics and proponent of what later became known as Braille); Jean Baptiste Carnoy (founder of cytology); Pierre Teilhard de Chardin (world famous palaeontologist and discoverer of Peking Man - even if his theology was suspect); Gregor Mendel (father of genetics - pictured, left); and Georges Lemaître (proposer of the Big Bang theory - pictured top and below).The last of these men in my small list, Mgr Georges Henri Joseph Édouard Lemaître (17 July 1894 – 20 June 1966), was probably one of the most, if not the most, important physicists of the 20th century - far greater than Einstein or Hawking, both of whose theories seem inadequate in comparison with his. Yet, sadly, we hear very little about this man, who first came up with the theory of the Big Bang - probably the most important scientific idea since Darwin's theories of Evolution. It seems that the modern world is uncomfortable with the fact a Belgian Catholic priest was also one of its greatest astronomers, mathematicians and physicists. Fr Georges Lemaître, who taught at the Catholic University of Louvain, is a massive stumbling block to those who suffer from the delusion that science and religious faith cannot (or should not) be compatible. Neither the fundamentalists of atheism nor the followers of false religions - which, by their very nature tend to be irrational - want to accept that, as Pope Benedict XVI recently taught, "there is friendship between science and faith, and that scientists can, through their vocation to study nature, follow an authentic and absorbing path of sanctity."
Mgr Georges Lemaître was the first proposer what became known as the Big Bang theory of the origin of the universe, which he called his "hypothesis of the primeval atom" - [the term "Big Bang" was later coined by Fred Hoyle, in an apparent attempt at sarcasm, as he was bitterly opposed to the theory]. By proposing his theory (or hypothesis), Lemaître opened himself up to ridicule and harassment from the (mainly atheistic) scientific community of the time. Of course, secularists and some of those scientists who place absolute faith in human reason and deny the existence of God don't like to be seen as "heretic hunters" (for they prefer to project such irrational behaviour onto Catholics). But, the case of Fr Lemaître is a classic example of how some scientists can reject advances in knowledge that clash with their own personal world-view. By the 1920's, when Lemaître first proposed his "hypothesis of the primeval atom", many atheistic scientists had rather smugly developed the idea that the universe is eternal - without a beginning, or a "moment of creation". So, they recoiled with terror and disdain when they discovered that a Catholic priest, who happened to be a superior mathematician and physicist, was proposing that the cosmos began like "a burst of fireworks" in which galaxies, like burning embers, spread out in a growing sphere from the center of the explosion.
According to Mark Midbon in "'A Day Without Yesterday': Georges Lemaitre and the Big Bang" (Catholic Education), "When Georges Lemaître was born in Charleroi, Belgium, most scientists thought that the universe was infinite in age and constant in its general appearance. The work of Isaac Newton and James C. Maxwell suggested an eternal universe. When Albert Einstein first published his theory of relativity in 1916, it seemed to confirm that the universe had gone on forever, stable and unchanging." So, when the young Lemaître began revising the theory of relativity as a graduate student in astronomy at the University of Cambridge, spending 1923/4 at St Edmund's House (now St Edmund's College), he knew that his conclusions - that the universe was expanding, and therefore must have had a beginning - would rock the scientific world.
After leaving Cambridge and returning to his native Belgium, Fr Georges Lemaître became a part-time lecturer at the Catholic University of Louvain. It was soon after taking up this post that he published his theory of an expanding universe in the 1927 Annales de la Société Scientifique de Bruxelles (Annals of the Scientific Society of Brussels). He chose as the title of his article, "A homogeneous Universe of constant mass and growing radius accounting for the radial velocity of extragalactic nebulae". The paper had little impact, as few astronomers outside Belgium took any notice of the journal. However, Lemaître was able to present his findings to Albert Einstein at a conference in Brussels later on that year. Einstein's initial response, though, seemed slightly patronising, as he told the young priest, "Your calculations are correct, but your grasp of physics is abominable!" As Midbon writes, "It was Einstein's own grasp of physics, however, that soon came under fire."
By 1930, and after Edwin Hubble's observations of far off galaxies seemed to confirm that they were in fact moving further away, it seemed that Lemaître's hypothesis was beginning to gain some support. Even so, whilst Hubble and his colleague, Sir Arthur Eddington, realised that the priest had bridged the gap between concrete observation and the theory of relativity, neither seemed able to accept that the universe had a beginning. Writing in a 1930 issue of Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Arthur Eddington described Georges Lemaître's 1927 article in Annales de la Société Scientifique de Bruxelles as a "brilliant solution" to the problems currently facing cosmology. Within a few months, though, Eddington wrote another article in the journal Nature (March, 1931) calling Lemaître's hypothesis that the universe had a physical beginning "repugnant" - not the words of an objective or dispassionate man! It was around this time that Fr Georges Lemaître attended a conference in London on spirituality and cosmology. It was at this event that he explicitly proposed that the universe had expanded from an initial point, a theory he called the "Primeval Atom" or the "the Cosmic Egg exploding at the moment of the creation theory" - which, it must be said, isn't as as catchy as the "Big Bang theory"!
In 1933, though, whilst Lemaître was jointly touring California with Einstein for a series of seminars, he detailed his theory of the exploding cosmic egg. After this particular lecture, Einstein stood up, applauded, and said, "This is the most beautiful and satisfactory explanation of creation to which I have ever listened." Later on in the same year, Georges Lemaître wrote another article for the Annales de la Société Scientifique de Bruxelles, in which he expanded upon his work, so that it became what we would now understand to be the Big Bang theory. This led to international fame and his ideas were widely circulated in the press. He was inducted as a member of the Royal Academy of Belgium and he also received - after being proposed by Albert Einstein, Charles de la Vallée-Poussin and Alexandre de Hemptinne - the Francqui Prize, the highest Belgian scientific honour, which was awarded by King Léopold III. In 1935, Fr Lemaître was installed as a Canon of Malines Cathedral, whilst Pope Pius XI made him a member of Pontifical Academy of Sciences one year later. He became the President of the Pontifical Academy in 1960, at which time Pope John XXIII made him a prelate of honour, or "Monsignor". In 1953, Lemaître was also awarded the Royal Astronomical Society's very first Eddington Medal.
Needless to say, despite the accolades, a large part of the scientific community, especially in the more secular parts of the world - such as Britain - continued to oppose Lemaître's hypothesis. And, as I mentioned above, some even began to ridicule his idea by cynically referring to it as the "Big Bang". One of the main centres of resistance to Fr Georges Lemaître's scientifically rational theory was Cambridge. There were two reasons why the cosmologists at Cambridge University seemed to recoil at Lemaître's proposition - namely the fact that they happened to prefer the "steady state" theory and also because they appeared determined to hold onto the atheistic "eternal universe" concept. However, a significant breakthrough confirming Lemaître's "cosmic egg" (Big Bang) theory occurred in 1964. In that year, whilst trying to fix a radio telescope at the Bell Laboratories in New Jersey, some astrophysicists came across a constant microwave interference. This interference was what we now know to be cosmic background radiation, which is a result (or an echo) of the Big Bang. In other words, the men who were fixing their telescopes in New Jersey, and who later won the Nobel Prize for their work, had accidentally discovered observable proof to confirm Mgr Georges Lemaître's theory that the universe had a beginning, an explosive and unique point in time when it came into being.
Even Mgr Lemaître's more recent detractors, such as the Cambridge based Stephen Hawking, have also had to swallow some of their pride. Hawking, who certainly used to believe that the universe is slowing down and would collapse on itself, announced, after a 1998 Berkeley discovery that the universe is actually expanding at an increasing rate (as Lemaître proposed), that, "This [has] led me to reconsider my theoretical prejudices." Maybe it's because Professor Hawking is a lifetime member of the Pontifical Academy of Sciences that he seems more open to reason and objectivity than some of his other, more openly atheistic, colleagues? Whatever the reason, it's good to know that - although there have been difficulties and debates - Georges Lemaître's clear thinking and objective reasoning is still giving shape to modern-day cosmology.
In 1966, soon after being told the good news that his theory had been given such credence through the discovery of background radiation, Mgr George Lemaître died. His ideas, though, continue to shine their light in the fields of cosmology, physics and mathematics. His spirituality and witness to the ultimate logic of Catholicism also continue to inspire many. Most scientists, and most human beings, now believe that there was a time when the universe came into being - a "day without yesterday" as Georges Lemaître rather whimsically put it. However, the debate continues amongst scientists as to how the cosmos began, even if people of faith - and especially Catholics - know that all things were created by God the Father, through and for Our Lord Jesus Christ.
[Images: 1 Fr Georges Lemaître with Albert Einstein during their tour of California in 1933; source: Astronomy Notes. 2 Fr Gregor Mendel, father of genetics and Augustinian Friar; this image is in the public domain; source: Wikimedia Commons. 3 Fr Georges Lemaître at the Catholic University of Louvain; this image is in the public domain; source: Wikimedia Commons. 4 A spiral galaxy, taken by the Hubble Space Telescope; this image is in the public domain and is copyright free, (see Wikimedia); source: Wikimedia Commons]



20 comments:
Bravo!
There's also Blessed Niels Stensen,(1638-1686), pioneering anatomist, geologist, and paleontologist, who was also a convert to the Faith, and eventually a bishop.
I like to take an interest in the speculations of science, which reminds me of a famous astronomer who proclaimed that he had no need of an hypothesis of God in order to understand His cosmology. But God, being much more humble than he, does not do without Professor De Laplace and his calculations. When the repudiator of the Creator lay on his death bed a friend reminded him of one of his celebrated discoveries... De Laplace replied: "What we do know is little less than nothing, what we do not know is immense". These sage words were indeed inspired by the God, whose home is in the immensity which was unknown to De Laplace.
As I believe that God is one, so is everything in the universe one; and the scientists who discovered the atom in the same way as the solar system, know this, that it is all one in origin. A harmony of this nature can only have its source and model from a unique mind. But God is also a Trinity and from which everything emerges: light, which can be compared to the Father; the indivisible space-time, which can be compared to the Son; motion, which corresponds to the Holy Spirit. God is Love and hence prodigality and sacrifice and what infinite prodigality we see in the entire universe! the superabundant profusion of atoms, of stars, of splendors in nature, of fires, of living species, of seeds, is a collaboration of the divine origins of all life. All life stirs in the universe, from the humblest larva to the most remotest nubula, is sacrifice; sacrifice of the part of the whole, of the inferior to the superior. Seen in this light, the entire creation is the annunciation of a more lofty sacrifice, the antithesis and at the same time a model of that Redemption in which the whole is immolated for the part, the superior sacrificed to the inferior. Let us always have before our eyes and in our hearts Praise and Thanksgiving to the Eternal Author of life in which "we live, move and have our being".
Great article. This whole episode was also an example of many scientists actually being unreasonable. They opposed the Big Bang theory precisely because it contradicted their atheistic beliefs. Here they are in their own words:
The physicist David Bohm rebuked the developers of the theory as "scientists who effectively turn traitor to science, and discard scientific facts to reach conclusions that are convenient to the Catholic Church." Sir Arthur Eddington, wrote, "The notion of a beginning is repugnant to me ... I simply do not believe that the present order of things started off with a bang. ... The expanding Universe is preposterous ... incredible ... it leaves me cold." Georges Politzer, wrote: “The universe was not a created object, if it were, then it would have to be created instantaneously by God and brought into existence from nothing. To admit creation, one has to admit, in the first place, the existence of a moment when the universe did not exist, and that something came out of nothingness. This is something to which science can not accede.”
It makes you wonder if these folks are trying to push their own beliefs at the expense of science...
@ GaryT
Thank you for supplying all the quotes. It's a sad reality of the modern world that a severe prejudice exists that compels people to believe a lie, namely that (atheistic) scientists are completely rational and objective super-beings, whilst the Church is some kind of oppressive, superstitious organisation of anti-scientists. The reality is, of course, that the truth is often opposite to this prejudice.
@ Anne
Thank you for your beautiful reflection.
@ Donna
Thank you, I was going to mention Blessed Niels Stensen, but I obviously forgot to add him to the list. There are so many great Catholic scientists that it was difficult for me to shorten the list.
@ Stacy
Thank you. And thank you for your excellent blog, and for standing up for the truth even when the irrational "rationalists" of secularism attack you (such as over your recent post on gay people in the park). Keep up the good work ;-)
http://sicetnonderful.blogspot.com/2011/09/thoughts-on-reluctant-sinners-blog-post.html
I wrote a brief response to this post, which can be summed up as follows:
While it is true that it is intellectually lazy to call the Church the enemy of science and proceed with a simplistic Church/Science dichotomy, it is equally intellectually lazy to assume that there is nothing to the claim that the Church and science have not always been the best of friends.
Interesting article. It is great that the Church can boast of a scientist of Lemaitre's level. Missing from the list, however, is Roger Boscovich, who may be the greatest priest-scientist in the history of the Church. The contributions listed for Bacon and Grosseteste, however, seem grossly overstated. I would like to see the sources.
As an active catholic AND scientist I am fascinated by this topic. What I really want to know is what was Mgr Georges Lemaître's reconciliation of his catholic faith and this new discovery? Did he go through periods of questioning his faith and how did he get through the atheistic science community which many scientist christians face on a daily basis.
@ Andrew
http://www.philosophybasics.com/philosophers_bacon_roger.html - "[Roger Bacon] is sometimes credited as one of the earliest European advocates of Empiricism and the modern scientific method".
http://www.bookrags.com/research/roger-bacon-scit-0212345/ (from a summary of "First Scientist: A Life of Roger Bacon" by Brian Clegg) - "Roger Bacon played a key role in the early stages of the movement which eventually led to the Scientific Revolution."
Also, from the same source, "Grossteste is regarded as one of the earliest influences in the development of modern scientific thought. He advocated developing comprehensive laws based on personal observations of nature...".
http://www.evolutionnews.org/2011/06/jerry_coyne_on_the_scientific_047431.html (from Michael Egnor in Evolution News) - "The scientific method as we know began with Roger Bacon O.F.M., a 13th century Franciscan friar who pioneered the empirical study of God's rational creation by rational man who was created in His image."
http://www.topsecretwriters.com/2010/12/the-history-of-fireworks-and-the-secret-of-friar-bacon/ (from "The History of Fireworks and the Secret of Friar Bacon") - "This Franciscan Friar as one of the earliest European advocates of the modern scientific method inspired by the works of Plato and Aristotle. This use of the modern scientific method led to various discoveries concerning a previously known substance typically used in fireworks."
http://www.experiment-resources.com/middle-ages-science.html () - "Robert Grosseteste, one of the major contributors to the scientific method, founded the Oxford Franciscan School and began to promote the dualistic scientific method first proposed by Aristotle."
Also, from the same source, "Roger Bacon is a name that belongs alongside Aristotle, Avicenna, Galileo, and Newton as one of the great minds behind the formation of the scientific method. He took the work of Grosseteste, Aristotle, and the Islamic alchemists, and used it to propose the idea of induction as the cornerstone of empiricism."
"Science in the Franciscan Order: A Historical Sketch" by John M Lenhart (2003), p 32 - "It may be said of [Bacon] that he laid down the principles of modern science and of the experimental method".
"God, Science and the Universe: The Integration of Science and Religion" by Dr John Swanson, Strategic Book Group (2010), p 75 - "[Bacon] was one of the earliest European advocates of what came to be called the modern scientific method."
"Scientific Method in practice" by Hugh G Gauch, Cambridge University Press (2002), p 222 - "Grosseteste's new scientific method - with its experiments, Method of Resolution and Composition, Method of Verification...was the paradigm for the design and analysis of scientific experiments."
I do not deny that some do seek to detract from the contributions made by these two men to the advancement of science, and to what would later develop into what we now call "modern science". But, it is true to say that objective historians of science often credit them as pioneers in their work on experimentation and the scientific method.
The profoundly shocking recent observations of the WMAP, SDSS, and 2 degree Field galaxy redshift survey (among others), all present evidence of a universe oriented geocentrically on its very largest observable scales.
We now know that this universe polarizers the light of quasars along a definable axis (in explicit contradiction to the predictions of Relativity), and that this same axis is found in the CMB itself, supposedly the "oldest light in the universe".
The axis happens to align, astonishingly with the ecliptic and equinoxes of Earth- that supposedly insignificant more which allegedly did not come into existence until 9 billion years after the fact.
How did the universe know to align its most incomprehensibly vast physical structures with an Earth that did not come into existence, supposedly, until nine billion years later?
Excellent question.
The wisdom of the magisterium, in never formally reversing the decree of the Holy Office in 1633, is becoming resplendently apparent.
I have often wondered about athiest scientists who regard themselves as being inflated and powerful geniuses. Which in fact, I think belong to the Cyclops family: they have but one eye in their forehead-which only measures and controls matter. They lack the other eye, that more marvelous and powerful eye, which penetrates and dominates the Spirit. They scoff at Man's likeness to God and make him out to be some accident or degenerate decendent of guadrupeds, yet they cannot in anyway explains man's highest nostaglia without that likeness. Their accounts just don't stack up. They reduce the idea of Man's spiritual life to some sort of carnal concupiscence or to directly unconscious reflexes to regulated instinctual motions. From being modeled by the hands of God, intermediate between nature and the spirit, worthy of being redeemed and called upon to redeem, they make him out to be a voracious animal, salacious and predatory, with no other destiny then to suffer before returning to the earth in despair. The Universe that God created needs to be interpreted like a second Bible and to translate it, God has written on every page of the Universe and its functions and movements, it bears all its traces of the spirit and the will of its Divine Creator. If man is made in the image and likeness of the Creator, then the world too is made in the Image and likeness of the Creator. It is for Scientists to discover those traces and to demonstrate that likeness. Nothing more.
It would appear that being atheistic can place o e at odds with scientific progress
THANK YOU FOR POSTING THIS! No one ever seems to mention Fr. Lemaitre in the Catholic Church. We should be proud!
Rick:
Could you please post some links to evidence to back up your assertions? I'd appreciate knowing where you are getting your information.
Good post! Indeed it is very important to remind everyone that most of the scientists mentioned were not just Catholics but were also clerics (and let us not forget Bishop Oresme and Father Buridan). O:)
On 9 August 2011 Father Roberto Busa SJ died in Gallarate (Italy). He was the first one to propose (in 1949) the idea of using computers for linguistic research. This made him the father of Computational Linguistic. He was able then to persuade Thomas J. Watson (of IBM) to support him in the preparation of the Index Thomisticus (an Index to all the works of St. Thomas Aquinas). The reason for starting this project was that he needed to study "interiority" in St. Thomas, and to do so an Index of the word "in" (as in "to be in") was necessary, and of course it was not present in the existing printed Indexes of St. Thomas works. If we are writing this blog, it is also thanks to him... See the Wikipedia entry. He was a friend.
@ Casa Santa Lidia + Antonio Giovanni Colombo
Thank you for your comments and for adding to the list. Very interesting!
S. Ellis:
With pleasure!
First, with regard to the universe-spanning axis, oriented with Earth's ecliptic and equinoxes, found both in the CMB and in the polarization of quasars:
http://arxiv.org/pdf/1011.2425v2
There are literally dozens of citations for followup if interested.
Second, with regard to the Earth-centered periodic preferred z-values of galaxies out to a billion light years:
http://arxiv.org/pdf/0711.4885v3
Excerpt:
"“....there is visible evidence in the raw data for an apparent concentric shell structure centered on the observer.”
An examination of the findings is available here:
http://www.galileowaswrong.com/galileowaswrong/features/CopernicanMyopiaFinal.pdf
Enjoy!
and
Post a Comment